• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记忆中图片和句子语义整合的寿命差异。

Life-span differences in semantic integration of pictures and sentences in memory.

作者信息

Pezdek K

出版信息

Child Dev. 1980 Sep;51(3):720-9.

PMID:7418508
Abstract

This study examined life-span developmental differences in spontaneous integration of semantically relevant material presented in pictures and sentences. 45 third graders, 45 sixth graders, 45 high school students, and 30 adults over 60 were presented a sequence of 24 pictures and sentences, followed by 24 intervening items. Each intervening item corresponded to, but was in the opposite modality from, one of the original items and was either semantically relevant or irrelevant to the corresponding original. In a "same-different" recognition test, data suggested that the sixth-grade and high school subjects semantically integrated original items with relevant intervening items that were in the opposite modality and made subsequent recognition responses on the basis of the integrated memory. Third graders and older adults, however, showed no evidence of spontaneous, cross-modality semantic integration. Further, increasing the temporal delay between presenting the to-be-integrated items, from 5 min to 1 day, decreased overall response sensitivity but did not alter the patterns of integration results. The findings are discussed in terms of age differences in the spontaneous use of strategies for effective memory processing, with the extreme age groups processing more formal characteristics of the stimuli in memory, and the middle 2 groups processing deeper, more semantic information.

摘要

本研究考察了在图片和句子中呈现的语义相关材料的自发整合方面的毕生发展差异。研究向45名三年级学生、45名六年级学生、45名高中生和30名60岁以上的成年人展示了由24张图片和句子组成的序列,随后是24个干扰项。每个干扰项与一个原始项目相对应,但形式相反,并且与相应的原始项目在语义上相关或不相关。在一项“相同-不同”识别测试中,数据表明六年级和高中受试者将原始项目与形式相反的相关干扰项进行了语义整合,并基于整合后的记忆做出了后续的识别反应。然而,三年级学生和老年人没有表现出自发的跨形式语义整合的证据。此外,将待整合项目呈现之间的时间延迟从5分钟增加到1天,降低了总体反应敏感性,但没有改变整合结果的模式。研究结果从有效记忆处理策略的自发使用方面的年龄差异进行了讨论,极端年龄组在记忆中处理刺激的更形式化特征,而中间两组处理更深层次、更语义化的信息。

相似文献

1
Life-span differences in semantic integration of pictures and sentences in memory.记忆中图片和句子语义整合的寿命差异。
Child Dev. 1980 Sep;51(3):720-9.
2
Memory for pictures: a life-span study of the role of visual detail.图片记忆:视觉细节作用的毕生研究
Child Dev. 1987 Jun;58(3):807-15.
3
Item and attribute storage of pictures and words in memory.图片和文字在记忆中的项目与属性存储。
Am J Psychol. 1980 Dec;93(4):603-15.
4
Recognition memory for components of pictures in children and adults.儿童和成人对图片组成部分的识别记忆。
Child Dev. 1980 Sep;51(3):899-901.
5
Effects of donepezil on verbal memory after semantic processing in healthy older adults.多奈哌齐对健康老年人语义加工后言语记忆的影响。
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2008 Jun;21(2):57-64. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e3181799df1.
6
Do children "DRM" like adults? False memory production in children.儿童会像成年人一样产生“错误记忆效应”吗?儿童错误记忆的产生。
Dev Psychol. 2008 Jan;44(1):169-81. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.169.
7
The nature and development of nonverbal implicit memory.非言语内隐记忆的本质与发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Oct;63(1):22-43. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0041.
8
Adult age differences in visual word recognition: semantic encoding and episodic retention.成人在视觉单词识别中的年龄差异:语义编码和情景记忆保持。
Exp Aging Res. 1986 Summer;12(2):71-8. doi: 10.1080/03610738608259439.
9
False recognition of emotional word lists in aging and Alzheimer disease.衰老和阿尔茨海默病中对情感词表的错误识别
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006 Jun;19(2):71-8. doi: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000213905.49525.d0.
10
Developmental changes in the inhibition of previously relevant information.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1997 Mar;64(3):317-42. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.2350.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of interest and enjoyment in adolescence. Part I. Attentional capacities.青少年兴趣和乐趣的发展。第一部分。注意力能力。
J Youth Adolesc. 1983 Oct;12(5):355-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02088719.