Suppr超能文献

佩特兹病三种不同治疗组的结果。

Results of three different therapeutic groups in Perthes' disease.

作者信息

Jani L F, Dick W

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Jul-Aug(150):88-94.

PMID:7428249
Abstract

Three groups of patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) were treated with the following 3 different methods of treatment: conservative treatment alone; immediate varus osteotomy; osteotomy alone when risk factors occurred. The best results were obtained by the immediate varus osteotomy operation. The risk factors were significantly less in this group. Immediate varus osteotomy probably avoids or reduces the occurrence of risk factors. Immediate osteotomy is not prescribed for all patients because in some the operation would be unnecessary. A good result is often possible by conservative treatment alone. As it is often difficult to classify the patients into the 4 standard groups defined by Catterall, at the time of onset of the disease, the age of the patient is a critical factor in the decision for conservative versus operative treatment. In our patients risk factors were significantly less in children younger than 6 years of age, and good results were found in 80% of these patients in Group I with conservative treatment alone. Since 1976, the following procedure has been used: conservative treatment (Thomas splint) in patients younger than 6 years of age; immediate varus osteotomy in the older patients.

摘要

三组患有Legg-Calvé-Perthes病(LCPD)的患者接受了以下三种不同的治疗方法:单纯保守治疗;即刻内翻截骨术;出现危险因素时行截骨术。即刻内翻截骨术取得了最佳效果。该组的危险因素明显较少。即刻内翻截骨术可能避免或减少了危险因素的发生。并非所有患者都采用即刻截骨术,因为在某些患者中手术可能不必要。仅通过保守治疗通常也能取得良好效果。由于通常很难将患者归入Catterall定义的4个标准组,在疾病发作时,患者的年龄是决定采用保守治疗还是手术治疗的关键因素。在我们的患者中,6岁以下儿童的危险因素明显较少,在第一组中,仅采用保守治疗的这些患者中有80%取得了良好效果。自1976年以来,采用了以下程序:6岁以下患者采用保守治疗(托马斯夹板);年龄较大的患者采用即刻内翻截骨术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验