• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灾难性医疗保险与成本控制:重构当前医疗保险体系

Catastrophic health insurance and cost containment: restructuring the current health insurance system.

作者信息

Zucker J L

出版信息

Am J Law Med. 1980 Spring;6(1):83-103.

PMID:7435508
Abstract

Catastrophic health insurance may be necessary to curb rising health care costs in the United States. A major factor in this rise has been the current structure of the nation's health insurance system, which inadequately protects individuals with expensive illnesses, but encourages over-insurance for less expensive illnesses. This Note examines the current health insurance system, and analyzes its impact on health care costs for individuals and society. It evaluates several proposals to modify the structure of the current health insurance system, and recommends the adoption of a catastrophic health insurance plan based on an economic definition of catastrophe. Such a plan would decrease shallow coverage, and would use coinsurance and deductible rates keyed to the individual's income as means of increasing consumer cost consciousness without making necessary care unreasonably expensive. This Note also recommends that a catastrophic plan only cover treatment that has been determined medically necessary by utilization review, and that this review encourage outpatient rather than costly inpatient treatment.

摘要

灾难医疗保险对于抑制美国不断上涨的医疗成本或许是必要的。成本上涨的一个主要因素是美国当前的医疗保险体系结构,该结构对患有高额费用疾病的个人保护不足,却鼓励对费用较低疾病的过度保险。本注释审视了当前的医疗保险体系,并分析了其对个人和社会医疗成本的影响。它评估了几项修改当前医疗保险体系结构的提议,并建议采用基于灾难的经济定义的灾难医疗保险计划。这样一个计划将减少浅层保险范围,并将根据个人收入设定的共保率和免赔额作为提高消费者成本意识的手段,同时又不会使必要的医疗费用变得过高。本注释还建议,灾难计划仅涵盖经利用审查确定为医疗必需的治疗,并且该审查应鼓励门诊治疗而非昂贵的住院治疗。

相似文献

1
Catastrophic health insurance and cost containment: restructuring the current health insurance system.灾难性医疗保险与成本控制:重构当前医疗保险体系
Am J Law Med. 1980 Spring;6(1):83-103.
2
Catastrophic medical protection: a plan for sharing excessive costs.
Urban Health. 1982 Nov-Dec;11(10):32-4, 45.
3
Just health care system reform.
J La State Med Soc. 1995 Sep;147(9):406-9, 412-6.
4
A cash-equivalent option under "major-risk" national health insurance.“重大风险”国家医疗保险下的现金等价物选项。
Policy Anal. 1978 Winter;4(1):123-7.
5
The need for single-payer catastrophic health insurance.
Conn Med. 1998 Apr;62(4):237-40.
6
The economics of catastrophic health insurance.巨额医疗保险的经济学
Conn Med. 1999 Oct;63(10):599-602.
7
"Catastrophic" coverage: proponents of national health insurance may settle for that.“灾难性”保险范围:国家医疗保险的支持者可能会满足于此。
Barrons. 1979 Mar 12;59(11):11, 16, 18.
8
Consumer-choice health plan (first of two parts). Inflation and inequity in health care today: alternatives for cost control and an analysis of proposals for national health insurance.消费者选择健康保险计划(两部分中的第一部分)。当今医疗保健中的通货膨胀与不公平:成本控制的替代方案及国家健康保险提案分析。
N Engl J Med. 1978 Mar 23;298(12):650-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197803232981204.
9
How will medical savings accounts affect medical spending?医疗储蓄账户将如何影响医疗支出?
Inquiry. 1996 Fall;33(3):225-36.
10
Strategies for financing national health insurance: who wins and who loses.国家医疗保险融资策略:谁赢谁输。
N Engl J Med. 1976 Oct 14;295(16):866-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197610142951605.

引用本文的文献

1
Which indicator should be used? A comparison between the incidence and intensity of catastrophic health expenditure: using difference-in-difference analysis.应该使用哪个指标?灾难性卫生支出的发生率与强度比较:运用双重差分分析
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Nov 11;12(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00403-w.