• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家医疗保险融资策略:谁赢谁输。

Strategies for financing national health insurance: who wins and who loses.

作者信息

Mitchell B M, Schwartz W B

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1976 Oct 14;295(16):866-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197610142951605.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM197610142951605
PMID:958290
Abstract

Two sources of funds are available to underwrite the costs of any national health-insurance plan: prepayments (premiums, payroll taxes and income taxes) and out-of-pocket payments (coinsurance and deductibles). The extent to which taxes rather than premiums are used to finance an insurance program will be the major determinant of how large a share of the costs of health care will be borne by higher-income groups. The extent to which coinsurance and deductible provisions are reduced or waived for low-income persons will have a less important, but still substantial, role in determining how the costs of a program are distributed. These financing principles, once understood, provide a basis for the design of health-insurance legislation that will achieve any pattern of income redistribution that may be desired.

摘要

有两种资金来源可用于承担任何国家医疗保险计划的费用

预付款(保费、工资税和所得税)和自付费用(共保费用和免赔额)。税收而非保费用于为保险计划融资的程度,将是高收入群体承担医疗保健费用份额大小的主要决定因素。对于低收入者,共保条款和免赔条款减少或免除的程度,在确定计划费用如何分配方面的作用虽不那么重要,但仍相当可观。一旦理解了这些融资原则,就能为医疗保险立法的设计提供基础,以实现任何可能期望的收入再分配模式。

相似文献

1
Strategies for financing national health insurance: who wins and who loses.国家医疗保险融资策略:谁赢谁输。
N Engl J Med. 1976 Oct 14;295(16):866-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197610142951605.
2
Equity in paying for health care services under a national insurance system.国家保险制度下医疗保健服务付费的公平性。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1975 Summer;53(3):337-52.
3
Medical savings accounts. American College of Physicians.医疗储蓄账户。美国医师学会。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Aug 15;125(4):333-40.
4
Out-of-pocket health spending by poor and near-poor elderly Medicare beneficiaries.贫困和接近贫困的老年医疗保险受益人的自付医疗费用。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):241-54.
5
National health insurance and family planning.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1971 Jul;3(3):50-5.
6
Redistributive effects in public health care financing.公共医疗保健融资中的再分配效应。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9(4):405-16. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0100-y. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
7
Financial Burden and Out-of-Pocket Expenditures for Mental Health Across Different Socioeconomic Groups: Results from HealthCare for Communities.不同社会经济群体心理健康的经济负担和自付费用:社区医疗保健的结果
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2001 Sep 1;4(3):141-150.
8
A design for a health insurance experiment.
Inquiry. 1974 Mar;11(1):5-27.
9
The effect of private health insurance on medical care utilization and self-assessed health in Germany.私人医疗保险对德国医疗保健利用和自我评估健康的影响。
Health Econ. 2010 Sep;19(9):1048-62. doi: 10.1002/hec.1642.
10
Medicare financing reform: a new Medicare premium.医疗保险融资改革:新的医疗保险保费。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1984 Spring;62(2):300-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Why it's time for a national health program in the United States.为何美国现在需要一项全国性的医疗保健计划。
West J Med. 1989 Jan;150(1):101-7.