Jones A L
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Jul;30(216):396-400.
The care given in a group practice to 47 patients with epilepsy was reviewed.Since 1960 all newly diagnosed patients had been referred for a specialist opinion and EEG before the diagnosis of epilepsy was confirmed.Patients were not being counselled sufficiently on the problems of epilepsy, and over half the patients considered themselves to be unacceptable to the rest of society.Less than half the patients were treated with a single drug; more could probably have achieved control with one drug and run fewer risks of drug interaction. Although consideration of the clinical condition and haematological results showed problems in only 38 per cent of the patients, the use of serum drug level estimation affected decisions on management in 70 per cent. I suggest that the more widespread use of serum drug levels would be of great value to general practitioners interested in the care of epileptics.In half the cases it was the patient and not the doctor who decided the frequency of consultations. Of 17 patients with problems, nine were not having regular follow-ups. Since patients with epilepsy maintain regular contact with their family practitioner by requests for repeat prescriptions, it should not be difficult for the doctor to exercise appropriate control of the care of his patients.
回顾了在一个联合诊所对47名癫痫患者的护理情况。自1960年以来,所有新诊断的患者在癫痫诊断得到确认之前,都被转介去寻求专家意见并进行脑电图检查。在癫痫问题上,患者没有得到足够的咨询,超过半数的患者认为自己不被社会其他成员所接受。不到一半的患者仅用一种药物治疗;可能更多患者使用一种药物就能实现病情控制,且药物相互作用的风险更低。尽管考虑临床状况和血液学结果显示仅38%的患者存在问题,但血清药物浓度测定影响了70%患者的治疗管理决策。我认为,对于关注癫痫患者护理的全科医生而言,更广泛地使用血清药物浓度具有重要价值。在半数病例中,决定复诊频率的是患者而非医生。在17名有问题的患者中,9名没有进行定期随访。由于癫痫患者会通过请求重复开药与他们的家庭医生保持定期联系,医生对其患者的护理进行适当管控应该并不困难。