Austin R, Dajda R
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Jul;30(216):417-9.
Prescriptions written by 261 doctors and their ancillaries were examined for errors. Owing to the differential incidence of such errors in the two groups, socio-economic characteristics were investigated but there was little to explain the differing standards of prescription writing. However, further examination revealed a strong tendency for doctors who make errors to have ancillary staff who also make errors, and vice versa.
对261名医生及其辅助人员所开的处方进行了错误检查。由于两组中此类错误的发生率不同，因此对社会经济特征进行了调查，但几乎没有什么可以解释处方书写标准的差异。然而，进一步检查发现，出错的医生其辅助人员也出错的倾向很强，反之亦然。
