Shakow D
Schizophr Bull. 1980;6(4):676-85. doi: 10.1093/schbul/6.4.676.
Data about numerous repeated administrations of the Kent-Rosanoff Association Test to schizophrenic subjects not found elsewhere in the literature are presented. A quantitative scoring system, in the form of a Composite Index, is also provided. And lastly, association results offer further evidence for the theory of segmental set. Data are provided on the responses of 60 schizophrenic patients and 60 normal subjects (college and noncollege) on two repetitions of the test, and five repetition for schizophrenics. Results of the comparison between schizophrenics and normals indicate that schizophrenics give fewer most common, more individual, and more unusual responses; have a higher Composite Index; have a lower percentage of responses given in identical form; and show less learning ability on test repetition. As between paranoids and hebephrenics, paranoids have higher repetition scores, and given more most common, more individual, and fewer unusual responses. These results reflect clinical condition and are viewed as corroborating the segmental set hypothesis.
本文呈现了关于对精神分裂症患者多次重复进行肯特-罗萨诺夫联想测验的数据，这些数据在其他文献中尚未见报道。同时还提供了一种以综合指数形式呈现的定量评分系统。最后，联想结果为片段集理论提供了进一步的证据。文中给出了60名精神分裂症患者和60名正常受试者（大学生和非大学生）在该测验进行两次重复时的反应数据，精神分裂症患者则进行了五次重复。精神分裂症患者与正常人的比较结果表明，精神分裂症患者给出的最常见、个体性更强以及更不寻常的反应较少；综合指数较高；以相同形式给出的反应百分比较低；并且在测验重复时学习能力较差。在偏执型精神分裂症患者和青春型精神分裂症患者之间，偏执型精神分裂症患者的重复得分更高，给出的最常见反应更多、个体性反应更多且不寻常反应更少。这些结果反映了临床状况，并被视为对片段集假说的佐证。
