Frenkel J K, Ruiz A
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1980 Nov;29(6):1167-80. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1980.29.1167.
We studied the prevalence of antibody to Toxoplasma gondii in 883 Costa Ricans between the ages of 15 and 26 years (mean 20.3). There were seven populations, two rural and five urban. The overall antibody prevalence was 61.4%. Because antibody prevalence was 57.1% in the 14 people who ate raw meat, and 61.6% in the 294 people who consumed raw eggs, meat and eggs could be excluded as important modes of transmission. We ascertained the presence of cats, type of soil contact, and flooring in the kitchen for every residence in which each individual lived from birth until interviewed. The 66% of people who indicated contact with cats had an antibody prevalence of 64%, and those without contact 56% (P = 0.02). In six of the seven populations, we found a positive correlation between cat contact and antibody prevalence; hence these six were studied together, and San Ramon, with a negative correlation, was examined separately. In the San Jose metropolitan population and in the total urban sample, cat contact was associated with a significantly higher antibody prevalence (P < 0.01). It was found that humans, even without acknowledged soil contact, acquire infection inside houses, especially with cement floors, when cats defecate in the house. Humans also acquire infection in or around houses with wooden floors, where the crawl space is an often unrecognized refuge of cats and a source of persistent soil contamination. San Ramon was the urban area with the highest human-cat contact (77%) and with the highest antibody prevalence in cats (75%). Although suggesting equal opportunities for infection, irrespective of cat contact, we cannot be certain in a retrospective study in which most of the infections took place an average of 15 years earlier. The most frequent antibody titer in our Costa Rican population was 1:1,024 (21%), much higher than the most frequent titers in a Colombian (1:64 to 1:128) and a U.S. population (1:16) of comparable age.
我们研究了883名年龄在15至26岁之间(平均20.3岁)的哥斯达黎加人的弓形虫抗体流行情况。共有七个群体,其中两个是农村群体,五个是城市群体。总体抗体流行率为61.4%。由于食用生肉的14人抗体流行率为57.1%,食用生鸡蛋、生肉的294人抗体流行率为61.6%,因此可以排除肉类和蛋类作为重要传播途径。我们确定了每个人从出生到接受访谈期间居住的每一处住所中猫的存在情况、与土壤接触的类型以及厨房的地面材料。表示与猫有接触的66%的人抗体流行率为64%,而无接触者为56%(P = 0.02)。在七个群体中的六个群体中,我们发现与猫接触和抗体流行率之间呈正相关;因此,将这六个群体合并进行研究,而圣拉蒙与其他群体呈负相关,单独进行了研究。在圣何塞都会区人口以及整个城市样本中,与猫接触与显著更高的抗体流行率相关(P < 0.01)。研究发现,即使没有明确的土壤接触,当猫在屋内排便时,人类在屋内尤其是在水泥地面的房屋中也会感染。人类在木地板房屋内或其周围也会感染,在那里,地板下空间常常是猫未被认识到的藏身之处以及持续土壤污染的源头。圣拉蒙是人与猫接触率最高(77%)且猫抗体流行率最高(75%)的城市地区。尽管这表明无论是否与猫接触,感染机会均等,但在一项回顾性研究中我们无法确定,因为大多数感染平均发生在15年前。在我们的哥斯达黎加人群中,最常见的抗体滴度为1:1,024(21%),远高于年龄相仿的哥伦比亚人群(1:64至1:128)和美国人群(1:16)中最常见的滴度。