Suppr超能文献

四种症状清单的比较(作者译)

[A comparison of four symptom lists (author's transl)].

作者信息

Baumann U, Stieglitz R D

出版信息

Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970). 1980;229(2):145-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00343079.

Abstract

At present there are four lists of symptoms in German (BL, FBL, BFB, KASSL) for which sufficient empirical data permit an evaluation. The BL, FBL, and BFB lists relate to items of the physiologic and physiologic/psychic fields, whereas the items of the KASSL refer more to psychic problems. With all four procedures the computation of global scores is justified by factor and item analyses, although the results of the BFB are least satisfactory. Information about reliability exists for all lists and point to favorable formal characteristics, i.e., symptom scores permit reliable assessment. The importance of symptom configurations is still ambiguous and needs further investigation. Measuring change with the four lists is a problem which is unsolved and needs further reflection. Because of its broad basis of test information the BL global score is recommended for use.

摘要

目前,德语中有四份症状清单(BL、FBL、BFB、KASSL),有足够的实证数据可供评估。BL、FBL和BFB清单涉及生理和生理/心理领域的项目,而KASSL的项目更多地涉及心理问题。通过所有这四种程序,通过因素和项目分析证明计算总体得分是合理的,尽管BFB的结果最不尽人意。所有清单都有关于信度的信息,且表明具有良好的形式特征,即症状得分允许进行可靠的评估。症状组合的重要性仍然不明确,需要进一步研究。用这四份清单测量变化是一个尚未解决的问题,需要进一步思考。由于其广泛的测试信息基础,建议使用BL总体得分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验