Schiess W, Welzel D, Gugler R
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;27(5):529-34. doi: 10.1007/BF00556887.
The efficacy of once-daily bopindolol, a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent with partial agonist activity, and of pindolol and atenolol in the treatment of essential hypertension has been compared. 369 patients were investigated in a double-blind parallel-group study. The treatment period was 10 weeks. Blood pressure normalisation (diastolic BP equal to or less than 90 mmHg) was to be achieved by a stepwise increase in the dose of the test drugs, and, if required, by addition of a diuretic. Normalisation of blood pressure was achieved in 71 to 76% of the subjects, with no significant differences between bopindolol, pindolol, and atenolol. Special attention was given to evaluation of side effects by using two methods for registration of all adverse events during the study. A low incidence of drug-induced side effects was observed, with no significant difference between bopindolol, pindolol, and atenolol. There was no evidence of unsuspected adverse reactions due to bopindolol.
比较了每日一次服用的具有部分激动剂活性的非选择性β-肾上腺素受体阻滞剂波吲洛尔、吲哚洛尔和阿替洛尔治疗原发性高血压的疗效。在一项双盲平行组研究中对369例患者进行了调查。治疗期为10周。通过逐步增加受试药物剂量,并在必要时加用利尿剂,使血压恢复正常(舒张压等于或低于90 mmHg)。71%至76%的受试者血压恢复正常,波吲洛尔、吲哚洛尔和阿替洛尔之间无显著差异。通过使用两种方法记录研究期间所有不良事件来特别关注副作用的评估。观察到药物引起的副作用发生率较低,波吲洛尔、吲哚洛尔和阿替洛尔之间无显著差异。没有证据表明波吲洛尔会引起意外的不良反应。