• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无效放线菌根瘤菌共生体弗兰克氏菌属EuI1(放线菌目)的特性分析

Characterization of an ineffective actinorhizal microsymbiont, Frankia sp. EuI1 (Actinomycetales).

作者信息

Baker D, Newcomb W, Torrey J G

出版信息

Can J Microbiol. 1980 Sep;26(9):1072-89. doi: 10.1139/m80-180.

DOI:10.1139/m80-180
PMID:7459722
Abstract

The actinomycete, Frankia sp. EuI1, isolated from root nodules of Elaeagnus umbellata is an infective endophyte but which lacks the ability to form an effective nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with its host. This ineffective organism can be distinguished easily from other frankiae, in vitro, on the basis of size, morphology, and the elaboration of a diffusible pigment. Cross-inoculation studies indicated that the host range of this symbiont is narrow and probably restricted to the Elaeagnaceae. In all cases of nodulation the symbiosis never developed nitrogenase activity and the microsymbiont never produced endophytic vesicles within the infected host cells. Sporangia were produced in vivo and in vitro so the morphogenetic block is apparently restricted to vesicle formation.

摘要

从胡颓子根瘤中分离出的放线菌Frankia sp. EuI1是一种感染性内生菌,但缺乏与宿主形成有效固氮共生关系的能力。这种无效的菌株在体外很容易根据大小、形态以及可扩散色素的形成与其他Frankia菌株区分开来。交叉接种研究表明,这种共生体的宿主范围狭窄,可能仅限于胡颓子科。在所有结瘤情况下,共生关系从未产生过固氮酶活性,而且微共生体在受感染的宿主细胞内从未产生内生泡囊。体内和体外均产生了孢子囊,因此形态发生阻滞显然仅限于泡囊形成。

相似文献

1
Characterization of an ineffective actinorhizal microsymbiont, Frankia sp. EuI1 (Actinomycetales).无效放线菌根瘤菌共生体弗兰克氏菌属EuI1(放线菌目)的特性分析
Can J Microbiol. 1980 Sep;26(9):1072-89. doi: 10.1139/m80-180.
2
Characterization of an effective actinorhizal microsymbiont, Frankia sp. AvcI1 (Actinomycetales).有效放线菌根瘤菌共生体弗兰克氏菌属 AvcI1(放线菌目)的特性
Can J Microbiol. 1980 Sep;26(9):1066-71. doi: 10.1139/m80-179.
3
Morphogenesis and fine structure of Frankia (Actinomycetales): the microsymbiont of nitrogen-fixing actinorhizal root nodules.弗兰克氏菌(放线菌目)的形态发生与精细结构:固氮放线菌根瘤的微共生体
Int Rev Cytol. 1987;109:1-88. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61719-2.
4
Frankia inefficax sp. nov., an actinobacterial endophyte inducing ineffective, non nitrogen-fixing, root nodules on its actinorhizal host plants.无效弗兰克氏菌新种,一种放线菌内生菌,在其放线菌根瘤植物宿主上诱导形成无效、不固氮的根瘤。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017 Mar;110(3):313-320. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0801-7. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
5
Biology of Frankia strains, actinomycete symbionts of actinorhizal plants.弗兰克氏菌菌株的生物学特性,放线菌根瘤植物的放线菌共生体。
Microbiol Rev. 1993 Jun;57(2):293-319. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.2.293-319.1993.
6
Variation in Frankia populations of the Elaeagnus host infection group in nodules of six host plant species after inoculation with soil.用土壤接种后,六种寄主植物根瘤中胡颓子属寄主感染组的弗兰克氏菌种群变异。
Microb Ecol. 2009 Aug;58(2):384-93. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9513-0. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
7
An overview of (Nod+/Fix+) and (Nod+/Fix-) interactions through genome mining and experimental modeling in co-culture and co-inoculation of .通过共培养和共接种中的基因组挖掘和实验模型研究,概述 (Nod+/Fix+)和 (Nod+/Fix-)相互作用。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 May 21;90(5):e0028824. doi: 10.1128/aem.00288-24. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
8
Specificity and effectivity in nodulation by Frankia on southern hemisphere actinorhiza.弗兰克氏菌对南半球放线根瘤植物结瘤的特异性和有效性
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995 Jan 15;125(2-3):231-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07363.x.
9
Natural variation in symbiotic nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium and Frankia spp.共生固氮根瘤菌和弗兰克氏菌属的自然变异
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1984;50(5-6):489-503. doi: 10.1007/BF02386222.
10
Molecular characterization of Frankia microsymbionts from spore-positive and spore-negative nodules in a natural alder stand.天然桤木林中孢子阳性和孢子阴性根瘤内弗兰克氏菌共生菌的分子特征分析
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Apr;60(4):1335-41. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.4.1335-1341.1994.

引用本文的文献

1
An overview of (Nod+/Fix+) and (Nod+/Fix-) interactions through genome mining and experimental modeling in co-culture and co-inoculation of .通过共培养和共接种中的基因组挖掘和实验模型研究,概述 (Nod+/Fix+)和 (Nod+/Fix-)相互作用。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 May 21;90(5):e0028824. doi: 10.1128/aem.00288-24. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
2
Carbonic Anhydrase Regulates Cytoplasmic pH of Nitrogen-Fixing Vesicles.碳酸酐酶调节固氮囊泡的细胞质 pH 值。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 23;24(11):9162. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119162.
3
Root Nodule Microsymbionts of Native in Algeria.
阿尔及利亚本土植物的根瘤微共生体。
Microbiol Insights. 2022 Oct 28;15:11786361221133794. doi: 10.1177/11786361221133794. eCollection 2022.
4
Draft genomes of non-nitrogen-fixing strains.非固氮菌株的基因组草图
J Genomics. 2021 Oct 22;9:68-75. doi: 10.7150/jgen.65429. eCollection 2021.
5
Stable Transformation of the Actinobacteria spp.不动杆菌属的稳定转化。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Jul 18;85(15). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00957-19. Print 2019 Aug 1.
6
Frankia Diversity in Host Plant Root Nodules Is Independent of Abundance or Relative Diversity of Frankia Populations in Corresponding Rhizosphere Soils.根瘤内弗兰克氏菌多样性与相应根际土壤中弗兰克氏菌种群的丰度或相对多样性无关。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Feb 14;84(5). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02248-17. Print 2018 Mar 1.
7
Genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic approaches towards understanding the molecular mechanisms of salt tolerance in Frankia strains isolated from Casuarina trees.采用基因组学、转录组学和蛋白质组学方法来了解从木麻黄树中分离出的弗兰克氏菌菌株耐盐性的分子机制。
BMC Genomics. 2017 Aug 18;18(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4056-0.
8
Sybr Green- and TaqMan-Based Quantitative PCR Approaches Allow Assessment of the Abundance and Relative Distribution of Frankia Clusters in Soils.基于SYBR Green和TaqMan的定量PCR方法可用于评估土壤中弗兰克氏菌簇的丰度和相对分布。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Feb 15;83(5). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02833-16. Print 2017 Mar 1.
9
What stories can the Frankia genomes start to tell us?弗兰克氏菌基因组能告诉我们什么故事?
J Biosci. 2013 Nov;38(4):719-26. doi: 10.1007/s12038-013-9364-1.
10
Ammonium effects on function and structure of nitrogen-fixing root nodules of Alnus incana (L.) Moench.铵对羊胡子柳(Alnus incana (L.) Moench)固氮根瘤功能和结构的影响。
Planta. 1982 Dec;156(4):332-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00397471.