Suppr超能文献

五种不同尿卟啉测定方法的比较研究(作者译)

[Comparative study of five different methods for measuring urinary porphyrins (author's transl)].

作者信息

Usuelli G, Piccinini S, Alessi E, Basagni M

出版信息

Quad Sclavo Diagn. 1978 Mar;14(1):103-13.

PMID:746113
Abstract

The AA. have compared five different methods for measuring urinary porphyrins (Bio-Rad porphyrins, Porphyrin-T Sibar, Reinkingh-Van Kampen, Schwartz and coll., Fischer-Ham). Based on the results obtained, for total porphyrins the best method appeared to be the Porphyrin-T Sibar test, while for the separate evaluation of uro- and coproporphyrins the most suitable method proved to be the one proposed by Reinkingh-Van Kampen. The investigations has also allowed the AA. to conclude that spectrophotometric reading can replace the fluorimetric one, without affecting the accuracy of results.

摘要

作者们比较了五种不同的测定尿卟啉的方法(伯乐卟啉法、Porphyrin - T Sibar法、Reinkingh - Van Kampen法、施瓦茨等人的方法、Fischer - Ham法)。根据所得结果,对于总卟啉而言,最佳方法似乎是Porphyrin - T Sibar试验,而对于尿卟啉和粪卟啉的单独评估,最适合的方法被证明是Reinkingh - Van Kampen提出的方法。这些研究还使作者们得出结论,分光光度法读数可以取代荧光法读数,而不会影响结果的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验