Suppr超能文献

数字麻醉期间感觉重量的改变。

Alterations in perceived heaviness during digital anaesthesia.

作者信息

Gandevia S C, McCloskey D I, Potter E K

出版信息

J Physiol. 1980 Sep;306:365-75. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013402.

Abstract
  1. It was shown by Gandevia & McCloskey (1977) that anaesthesia of the thumb causes weights lifted by thumb flexion to feel heavier, and weights lifted by thumb extension to feel lighter. This was confirmed by Marsden, Rothwell & Traub (1979). Gandevia & McCloskey explained the effects in terms of altered motor command (and so, altered 'sense of muscular force, or heaviness') required when sources of peripheral reflex facilitation or inhibition were removed by anaesthesia. Marsden et al. proposed, instead, that co-contraction of antagonists altered in anaesthesia. They said that increases in heaviness occurred for flexion because anaesthesia was associated with increased activity in the thumb extensor and, similarly, that decreases in heaviness occurred for extension because anaesthesia reduced activity in the thumb flexor. 2. The apparent heaviness of weights lifted by flexion of the thumb is not systematically altered by paralysis of the extensor of the thumb (radial nerve block at the elbow). Heaviness is increased by local anaesthetization of the thumb (digital nerve block). If paralysis of the thumb extensor is induced after digital nerve block, no further alteration in apparent heaviness occurs. 3. If extensor co-contraction is encouraged for stabilization of the wrist, as by having subjects perform an isometric contraction with the index-finger while lifting weights by thumb flexion, the apparent heaviness of the weights is increased. If co-contraction of the extensors is prevented by radial nerve block the manoeuvre of simultaneous contraction of the index finger then fails to alter the heaviness of weights lifted by thumb flexion. 4. The middle finger can be postured in such a way that active extension but not active flexion of its distal joint is impossible. When co-contraction of the extensor cannot act at the distal joint, anaesthetization of the middle finger causes an increase in apparent heaviness of weights lifted by flexion of this joint. 5. The effects of digital anaesthesia on the apparent heaviness of objects lifted by digital flexion are not caused by co-contraction of the extensors of the digits, as proposed by Marsden et al. Where extensor co-contraction occurs unrelated to the digital flexion task, as in stabilization of the wrist during simultaneous flexion of more than one digit, it may affect the apparent heaviness of objects borne by individual digits.
摘要
  1. 甘德维亚和麦克洛斯基(1977年)指出,拇指麻醉会使拇指屈曲提起的重量感觉更重,而拇指伸展提起的重量感觉更轻。这一点得到了马斯登、罗斯韦尔和特劳布(1979年)的证实。甘德维亚和麦克洛斯基从麻醉去除外周反射促进或抑制源时所需的运动指令改变(因此,“肌肉力量感或重量感”改变)的角度解释了这些效应。相反,马斯登等人提出,麻醉时拮抗肌的共同收缩发生了改变。他们说,屈曲时重量感增加是因为麻醉与拇指伸肌活动增加有关,同样,伸展时重量感降低是因为麻醉降低了拇指屈肌的活动。2. 拇指伸展肌麻痹(肘部桡神经阻滞)不会系统性地改变拇指屈曲提起重量的明显重量感。拇指局部麻醉(指神经阻滞)会使重量感增加。如果在指神经阻滞后诱导拇指伸肌麻痹,明显重量感不会进一步改变。3. 如果通过让受试者在拇指屈曲提起重量时用食指进行等长收缩来鼓励伸肌共同收缩以稳定手腕,重量的明显重量感会增加。如果通过桡神经阻滞防止伸肌共同收缩,那么食指同时收缩的动作就不会改变拇指屈曲提起重量的重量感。4. 中指可以以这样一种方式摆放,即其远端关节无法进行主动伸展但可以进行主动屈曲。当伸肌的共同收缩无法作用于远端关节时,中指麻醉会使该关节屈曲提起重量的明显重量感增加。5. 手指麻醉对手指屈曲提起物体的明显重量感的影响并非如马斯登等人所提出的那样是由手指伸肌的共同收缩引起的。当伸肌共同收缩与手指屈曲任务无关时,比如在多个手指同时屈曲时稳定手腕,它可能会影响单个手指所承载物体的明显重量感。

相似文献

8
Human flexor pollicis longus: role of peripheral inputs in weight-matching.
Neurosci Lett. 1995 Dec 15;201(3):203-6. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(95)12179-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The neural basis of the senses of effort, force and heaviness.努力感、力感和沉重感的神经基础。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Mar;237(3):589-599. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5460-7. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
2
The sensory origin of the sense of effort is context-dependent.用力感觉的感觉起源取决于具体情境。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jul;236(7):1997-2008. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5280-9. Epub 2018 May 5.
4
The fusimotor and reafferent origin of the sense of force and weight.力与重量感觉的梭内肌运动神经元和传入起源。
J Physiol. 2011 Jul 1;589(Pt 13):3135-47. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.208447. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
8
Limited independent flexion of the thumb and fingers in human subjects.人类受试者拇指和手指的有限独立屈曲。
J Physiol. 1994 Sep 15;479 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):487-97. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020312.

本文引用的文献

2
Human position sense and sense of effort.
Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1964;18:387-400.
4
The sensory mechanism of servo action in human muscle.人体肌肉中伺服作用的感觉机制。
J Physiol. 1977 Feb;265(2):521-35. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011728.
9
Kinesthetic sensibility.动觉感受性
Physiol Rev. 1978 Oct;58(4):763-820. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1978.58.4.763.
10
Servo action in the human thumb.人类拇指的伺服动作。
J Physiol. 1976 May;257(1):1-44. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011354.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验