Suppr超能文献

通过匹配重量和抓握物体揭示人类拇指肌肉的神经和生物力学特性

Neural and biomechanical specializations of human thumb muscles revealed by matching weights and grasping objects.

作者信息

Kilbreath S L, Gandevia S C

机构信息

Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Physiol. 1993 Dec;472:537-56. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019961.

Abstract
  1. Human manual dexterity has been linked by some to biomechanical adaptations of the hand and by others to neural adaptations. To investigate neural adaptations, the present study using the performance of four muscles acting on the index and thumb, quantified weight matching and electromyography. 2. The accuracy (i.e. reproducibility) of weight matching was used to investigate whether thumb muscles (i.e. flexor pollicis longus (FPL) and adductor pollicis (AP)) perform differently from index muscles (i.e. flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI)), and whether intrinsic hand muscles (AP and FDI) perform differently from extrinsic ones (FPL and FDP). 3. Subjects lifted reference weights on the right which represented predetermined percentages of a force generated in a maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) ranging from 2.5% to 35% MVC (and to 50% MVC in two muscles) and matched them with a variable weight lifted in the same way on the left. 4. Analysis of the coefficients of variation (c.v., expressed as a percentage) and the standard deviations calculated for repeated estimates of perceived heaviness, revealed significant differences in the accuracy of weight matching between different muscles and between reference weights. Based on the c.v., subjects lifted more accurately with FPL and AP (the two thumb muscles) than with the two index muscles. The two intrinsic hand muscles (FDI and AP) were equally accurate, and significantly more accurate than FDP which was the least accurate muscle. The high accuracy for FPL remained when accuracy was expressed in terms of the torque produced by the muscles when lifting the reference weights, and also when the torques were converted to absolute intramuscular forces. 5. Accuracy (based on c.v.) decreased significantly with light weights and increased with heavy weights for all muscles except FPL, which was equally accurate over a very wide range of weights (< 2.5% to 50% MVC). When data from all muscles were pooled, the c.v. increased from 12.9 to 19.1 as the weights lifted decreased from 35% to 2.5% MVC. 6. To examine the functional implications of the weight-matching study, electromyographic activity (EMG) was recorded with fine-wire electrodes from the same four muscles while subjects lifted cylinders of different widths (17-50 mm) and weights (15-1000 g). For recordings in which integrated EMG was linearly related to force up to maximal levels, the amplitudes of the EMGs at 'lift off' and at the mid-point of the 'hold' phase of the task were expressed relative to the maximal EMG during a MVC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 一些人将人类手部的灵巧性与手部的生物力学适应联系起来,另一些人则将其与神经适应联系起来。为了研究神经适应,本研究通过作用于食指和拇指的四块肌肉的表现,对重量匹配和肌电图进行了量化。2. 重量匹配的准确性(即可重复性)用于研究拇指肌肉(即拇长屈肌(FPL)和拇收肌(AP))与食指肌肉(即指深屈肌(FDP)和第一背侧骨间肌(FDI))的表现是否不同,以及手部固有肌肉(AP和FDI)与外在肌肉(FPL和FDP)的表现是否不同。3. 受试者举起右侧的参考重量,这些重量代表最大自主收缩(MVC)产生的力的预定百分比,范围从2.5%到35%MVC(两块肌肉中为50%MVC),并将其与以相同方式在左侧举起的可变重量相匹配。4. 对感知重量的重复估计计算出的变异系数(c.v.,以百分比表示)和标准差的分析表明,不同肌肉之间以及参考重量之间在重量匹配的准确性上存在显著差异。基于c.v.,受试者使用FPL和AP(两块拇指肌肉)比使用两块食指肌肉举起得更准确。两块手部固有肌肉(FDI和AP)的准确性相同,且显著高于最不准确的肌肉FDP。当以举起参考重量时肌肉产生的扭矩来表示准确性时,以及当扭矩转换为绝对肌肉内力量时,FPL的高准确性依然存在。5. 除FPL外,所有肌肉的准确性(基于c.v.)随着重量变轻而显著降低,随着重量变重而增加,FPL在非常宽的重量范围内(<2.5%至50%MVC)准确性相同。当汇总所有肌肉的数据时,随着举起的重量从35%MVC降至2.5%MVC,c.v.从12.9增加到19.1。6. 为了研究重量匹配研究的功能意义,当受试者举起不同宽度(17 - 50毫米)和重量(15 - 1000克)的圆柱体时,用细线电极记录了相同四块肌肉的肌电活动(EMG)。对于肌电积分与力直至最大水平呈线性相关的记录,任务“提起”阶段和“保持”阶段中点的肌电图振幅相对于MVC期间的最大肌电图表示。(摘要截断于400字)

相似文献

3
Limited independent flexion of the thumb and fingers in human subjects.人类受试者拇指和手指的有限独立屈曲。
J Physiol. 1994 Sep 15;479 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):487-97. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020312.
10
Human flexor pollicis longus: role of peripheral inputs in weight-matching.
Neurosci Lett. 1995 Dec 15;201(3):203-6. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(95)12179-x.

引用本文的文献

2
Recovery of pinch force sense after short-term fatigue.短期疲劳后捏力感觉的恢复。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 9;13(1):9429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36476-8.
3
Effect of pinch types on pinch force sense in healthy adults.捏力类型对健康成年人捏力感知的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Oct 26;16:990431. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.990431. eCollection 2022.
4
The effect of pinch span on pinch force sense in healthy participants.捏取跨度对健康受试者捏力感知的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb;85(2):474-484. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02534-y. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
8
Constraints for control of the human hand.人手控制的约束条件。
J Physiol. 2011 Dec 1;589(Pt 23):5583-93. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.217810. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
10
Task-dependent organization of pinch grip forces.捏力的任务依赖型组织。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;180(2):367-76. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0864-9. Epub 2007 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

5
Role of central and peripheral signals in force sensation during fatigue.
Exp Neurol. 1983 Aug;81(2):497-503. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(83)90278-9.
6
The role of the corticospinal tract in the evolution of human digital dexterity.
Brain Behav Evol. 1983;23(3-4):165-83. doi: 10.1159/000121494.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验