Burkman R T
Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Mar;57(3):269-76.
The Women's Health Study, a concurrent case-control study at 16 hospitals in 9 cities across the United States, examined the relationship between use of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) severe enough to require hospitalization. After final classification, 1447 patients were eligible as PID subjects and 3453 patients were eligible as controls. For all current IUD users, the estimated relative risk of hospitalization with the diagnosis of PID was 1.6. However, the relative risk was about twofold when only individuals experiencing their first episode of the disorder were considered. The study also demonstrated an increased association for women aged 25 years or less and for nonblack women. Recent insertion or reinsertion of an IUD was associated with increased risk for PID, but total duration of use was not. Furthermore, the effect of IUD use on the development of PID persisted for several months after the IUD had been removed. The study also confirmed previous findings that the type of device does not markedly influence risk, and that the relative risk of PID is higher when IUD use is compared with use of other contraceptives or use of no contraceptives. Finally, the study suggests that users of nonpermanent forms of contraception other than the IUD have some form of protection against the development of PID.
妇女健康研究是一项在美国9个城市的16家医院开展的同期病例对照研究,该研究调查了使用宫内节育器(IUD)与严重到需要住院治疗的盆腔炎(PID)之间的关系。最终分类后,1447例患者符合PID受试者标准,3453例患者符合对照标准。对于所有当前使用IUD的用户,诊断为PID而住院的估计相对风险为1.6。然而,仅考虑首次发生该疾病的个体时,相对风险约为两倍。该研究还表明,25岁及以下的女性和非黑人女性的关联性增加。近期插入或重新插入IUD与PID风险增加相关,但使用总时长无关。此外,IUD使用对PID发生的影响在IUD取出后持续数月。该研究还证实了先前的发现,即节育器类型不会显著影响风险,并且与使用其他避孕方法或不使用避孕方法相比,使用IUD时PID的相对风险更高。最后,该研究表明,除IUD外使用非永久性避孕方式的用户对PID的发生有某种形式的保护作用。