• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生在开具380A铜宫内节育器处方时面临的障碍。

Barriers to prescribing the Copper T 380A intrauterine device by physicians.

作者信息

Kooiker C H, Scutchfield F D

机构信息

Planned Parenthood of San Diego, CA.

出版信息

West J Med. 1990 Sep;153(3):279-82.

PMID:2219892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1002531/
Abstract

From a questionnaire sent to all obstetricians and gynecologists and all family and general practitioners in San Diego County, California, regarding the Copper T 380A intrauterine device, substantial barriers to prescribing it were identified. Of all physicians responding, 40% reported that they were not recommending the Copper T 380A to anyone, the single most common reason given being concern about medical liability. A lack of knowledge about the new device, a lack of intrauterine device insertion skills, and certain medical practice settings were also important barriers to prescribing it. The new intrauterine device is considered in the context of innovation-diffusion theory. Substantial amounts of education and training and improvement in the medical-legal climate are needed before current barriers to prescribing the new device are removed.

摘要

通过向加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥县的所有妇产科医生以及所有家庭医生和全科医生发送一份关于铜T 380A宫内节育器的调查问卷,发现了开这种节育器存在的重大障碍。在所有回复的医生中,40%报告称他们不向任何人推荐铜T 380A,给出的最常见单一原因是担心医疗责任。对这种新器械缺乏了解、缺乏宫内节育器插入技能以及某些医疗执业环境也是开这种节育器的重要障碍。从创新传播理论的角度来考虑这种新型宫内节育器。在消除目前开这种新器械存在的障碍之前,需要大量的教育、培训以及改善医疗法律环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/1002531/d80b7bed2318/westjmed00109-0054-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/1002531/d80b7bed2318/westjmed00109-0054-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/1002531/d80b7bed2318/westjmed00109-0054-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers to prescribing the Copper T 380A intrauterine device by physicians.医生在开具380A铜宫内节育器处方时面临的障碍。
West J Med. 1990 Sep;153(3):279-82.
2
The decline in popularity of the intrauterine device. A survey of general practitioner attitudes and practices in New South Wales.宫内节育器受欢迎程度的下降。新南威尔士州全科医生态度及做法的调查。
Med J Aust. 1994 Jan 3;160(1):19-21.
3
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
4
Intrauterine contraception: the role of general practitioners in four Dutch general practices.宫内避孕:荷兰四家全科诊所中全科医生的作用
Contraception. 2004 Apr;69(4):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.12.002.
5
Physician-identified barriers to intimate partner violence screening.医生确定的亲密伴侣暴力筛查障碍。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Oct;14(8):713-20. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.713.
6
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
7
Norplant prescribing in family practice.在家庭医疗中使用皮下埋植避孕剂的处方开具
J Fam Pract. 1996 Mar;42(3):267-72.
8
Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.铜T 380A宫内节育器与多负载铜375/250宫内节育器在一项对比临床试验中的性能表现。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995 Mar;24(1):59-65.
9
Paediatric homoeopathy in general practice: where, when and why?全科医疗中的儿科顺势疗法:地点、时间与原因?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jun;59(6):743-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02213.x.
10
Reconsidering IUDs.重新审视宫内节育器
AVSC News. 1992 Jul;30(2):7-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with long-acting reversible contraception use among women Veterans in the ECUUN study.ECUUN 研究中女性退伍军人使用长效可逆避孕措施的相关因素。
Contraception. 2019 Sep;100(3):234-240. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 29.
2
Medical student simulation training in intrauterine contraception insertion and removal: an intervention to improve comfort, skill, and attitudes.医学生宫内节育器放置与取出模拟训练:一项改善舒适度、技能和态度的干预措施。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2016 Feb 23;1:3. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0009-2. eCollection 2016.
3
The comparison the effect of training by means of simulation and oral method on midwives' skill in management of shoulder dystocia.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease.宫内节育器与盆腔炎之间的关联。
Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Mar;57(3):269-76.
2
Four years of experience with the TCu 380A intrauterine contraceptive device.
Fertil Steril. 1981 Aug;36(2):159-63.
3
Tubal infertility and the intrauterine device.输卵管性不孕与宫内节育器
N Engl J Med. 1985 Apr 11;312(15):941-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198504113121502.
模拟训练法与口头讲授法对助产士肩难产处理技能影响的比较
J Educ Health Promot. 2017 Jun 5;6:50. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_115_15. eCollection 2017.
4
Evidence-based selection of candidates for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD).基于循证的左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器(IUD)候选者选择。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):26-33. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130142.
5
Evaluation of midwifery students' competency in providing intrauterine device services using objective structured clinical examination.使用客观结构化临床考试评估助产专业学生提供宫内节育器服务的能力。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2011 Summer;16(3):191-6.
6
The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out?: family physicians' perceptions of risk and indications.证据确凿。为什么宫内节育器仍然不普及?家庭医生对风险和适应症的看法。
Can Fam Physician. 2008 Apr;54(4):560-6.
7
Determinants of contraceptive availability at medical facilities in the Department of Veterans Affairs.退伍军人事务部医疗设施中避孕药具可及性的决定因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Mar;21 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S33-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00372.x.
8
The power of information and contraceptive choice in a family planning setting in Mexico.墨西哥计划生育背景下信息与避孕选择的影响力
Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Aug;76(4):277-81. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.4.277.
4
Primary tubal infertility in relation to the use of an intrauterine device.与宫内节育器使用相关的原发性输卵管性不孕
N Engl J Med. 1985 Apr 11;312(15):937-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198504113121501.
5
The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?
Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 Mar-Apr;18(2):52-7.
6
The intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease revisited: new results from the Women's Health Study.
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jul;72(1):1-6.
7
Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: recent developments.
Contraception. 1987 Jul;36(1):97-109. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(87)90063-1.
8
Effectiveness of IUDs: a review.宫内节育器的有效性:一项综述。
Contraception. 1987 Jul;36(1):55-84. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(87)90061-8.