Kregor P J, Senft D, Parvin D, Campbell C, Toomey S, Parker C, Gillespy T, Swiontkowski M F
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA.
J Orthop Res. 1995 Sep;13(5):715-24. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100130511.
The limited contact dynamic compression plate and partial contact plate were designed to decrease contact with cortical bone in an attempt to decrease cortical ischemia, remodeling, and eventual porosis under the plate after use of standard dynamic compression plates. This study quantified cortical bone blood flow beneath the plate with these three different designs in a sheep tibia fracture model. In 18 skeletally immature sheep, the right tibia was fractured and then was internally fixed with an interfragmentary screw and a dynamic compression plate, limited contact dynamic compression plate, or partial contact plate. At 12 weeks, cortical bone perfusion was assessed with laser Doppler flowmetry in nine areas beneath the plate. The baseline (before fracture) cortical bone cell flux averaged 100 +/- 60 mV. After fracture, this decreased to 60 +/- 48 mV (p < 0.0003); immediately after plating, the perfusion averaged 29 +/- 25 mV (p < 0.01). Cortical bone perfusion then increased to 106 +/- 52, 165 +/- 71, and 163 +/- 71 mV at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after fracture (p < 0.001 for all when compared with values after plating). No significant differences in cortical perfusion were seen between the types of plate. Cortical porosity under the plate was assessed with digital density analysis of microradiographs of this region. No significant difference was seen between the types of plate in this analysis or in biomechanical and disulphine blue perfusion analysis. Thus, no significant advantage was seen for the new plate designs used in this model. This lack of advantage may be a result of the immature animals used in the study, the protocol for blood flow measurement, the invasive periosteal stripping employed to create the fracture, or all three. However, as advantages with the new plate designs have been seen in other studies, this area warrants further investigation.
有限接触动力加压钢板和部分接触钢板的设计目的是减少与皮质骨的接触,试图减少使用标准动力加压钢板后钢板下方皮质骨的缺血、重塑以及最终的骨质疏松。本研究在绵羊胫骨骨折模型中,对这三种不同设计的钢板下方皮质骨血流进行了量化。在18只骨骼未成熟的绵羊中,右侧胫骨骨折,然后用一枚骨折块间螺钉和一块动力加压钢板、有限接触动力加压钢板或部分接触钢板进行内固定。在12周时,用激光多普勒血流仪评估钢板下方九个区域的皮质骨灌注。基线(骨折前)皮质骨细胞通量平均为100±60 mV。骨折后,该值降至60±48 mV(p<0.0003);钢板固定后即刻,灌注平均为29±25 mV(p<0.01)。骨折后2、6和12周时,皮质骨灌注分别增加至106±52、165±71和163±71 mV(与钢板固定后的值相比,所有值p<0.001)。不同类型钢板之间的皮质灌注未见显著差异。通过对该区域微放射照片的数字密度分析评估钢板下方的皮质骨孔隙率。在该分析以及生物力学和亚甲蓝灌注分析中,不同类型钢板之间未见显著差异。因此,在该模型中使用的新型钢板设计未见显著优势。这种缺乏优势可能是由于研究中使用的动物未成熟、血流测量方案、为造成骨折而采用的侵入性骨膜剥离或这三者共同导致的。然而,由于在其他研究中已观察到新型钢板设计的优势,该领域值得进一步研究。