为什么研究伦理委员会之间会存在分歧？
Why do research ethics committees disagree with each other?
作者信息
Foster C
机构信息
Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College, London.
出版信息
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Jul-Aug;29(4):315-8.
Abstract
Research ethics committees have to ensure that research projects are asking sensible questions and are designed so that the questions will be answered, that the research subjects who are involved will not come to unnecessary harm, and that the autonomy of the research subjects will be respected. Where research proposals cannot fulfill all these criteria, research ethics committees have to perform a delicate balancing act amongst competing moral claims. These arise when, for example, the research is non-therapeutic or the research subjects are incompetent to give consent. Given that the balance of conclusions is so sensitive, it is hardly surprising that different committees sometimes disagree with each other.
摘要
研究伦理委员会必须确保研究项目提出合理的问题，并进行合理设计以便能够回答这些问题，确保参与研究的受试者不会受到不必要的伤害，且其自主性会得到尊重。如果研究提案无法满足所有这些标准，研究伦理委员会就必须在相互冲突的道德主张之间进行微妙的权衡。例如，当研究是非治疗性的或者受试者无能力给予同意时，就会出现这些相互冲突的道德主张。鉴于结论的权衡如此敏感，不同委员会有时相互意见不一也就不足为奇了。
相似文献
1
Why do research ethics committees disagree with each other?为什么研究伦理委员会之间会存在分歧？
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Jul-Aug;29(4):315-8.
2
Ethics Committees and Mental Health.伦理委员会与心理健康
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed). 2018 Apr-Jun;47(2):129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.rcp.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Alzheimer disease ethics--informed consent and related issues in clinical trials: results of a survey among the members of the Research Ethics Committees in Sweden.阿尔茨海默病伦理——临床试验中的知情同意及相关问题：瑞典研究伦理委员会成员的调查结果
Int Psychogeriatr. 2003 Jun;15(2):157-70. doi: 10.1017/s1041610203008846.
4
Ethical research with the mentally disordered.针对精神障碍患者的伦理研究。
Can J Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;42(5):485-91. doi: 10.1177/070674379704200504.
5
Obtaining consent for research studies on incompetent subjects: the Quebec experience.获取对无行为能力受试者进行研究的同意：魁北克的经验。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Mar;29(3):496-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1627-5. Epub 2003 Feb 11.
6
Why the tolerance of potential harms? Research ethics in Alzheimer disease.为何容忍潜在危害？阿尔茨海默病的研究伦理
Account Res. 1999;7(2-4):241-53. doi: 10.1080/08989629908573955.
7
Why do research ethics committees disagree?为什么研究伦理委员会存在分歧？
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Sep-Oct;29(5):410-1.
8
Ethics in clinical research: searching for absolutes.临床研究中的伦理：探寻绝对准则。
CMAJ. 1998 May 19;158(10):1303-5.
9
Decisional capacity, older human research subjects, and IRBs: beyond forms and guidelines.决策能力、老年人类研究受试者与机构审查委员会：超越表格与指南
Stanford Law Pol Rev. 1998 Spring;9(2):359-71.
10
Competence and consent to research: a critique of the recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.研究的能力与同意：对国家生物伦理咨询委员会建议的批判
Account Res. 1999;7(2-4):265-76. doi: 10.1080/08989629908573957.
引用本文的文献
1
Varying Degrees of Animal Reification by Stakeholders in Experimental Research.实验研究中利益相关者对动物不同程度的物化
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;12(2):190. doi: 10.3390/ani12020190.
2
Observational study of potential risk factors of medication administration errors.药物给药错误潜在风险因素的观察性研究。
Pharm World Sci. 2003 Dec;25(6):264-8. doi: 10.1023/b:phar.0000006519.44483.a0.
3
New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.研究伦理委员会的新治理安排：促进研究是以牺牲参与者的利益为代价实现的吗？
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):318-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.318.
4
Ethics in exercise science research.运动科学研究中的伦理问题。
Sports Med. 2002;32(3):169-83. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232030-00002.
5
Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders.涉及地域分散受试者的研究的伦理批准：英国医学研究伦理委员会/地方研究伦理委员会系统的不适用性及与罕见遗传病的相关性
J Med Ethics. 2001 Oct;27(5):347-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.5.347.
6
Responses by four Local Research Ethics Committees to submitted proposals.四个地方研究伦理委员会对提交提案的回复。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):274-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.274.
7
The views of members of Local Research Ethics Committees, researchers and members of the public towards the roles and functions of LRECs.地方研究伦理委员会成员、研究人员和公众对地方研究伦理委员会的角色和职能的看法。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Jun;23(3):186-90. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.3.186.
8
Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials--an "elaborate ritual"?为新生儿随机对照试验获取知情同意——一种“繁琐的程序”？
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 May;76(3):F143-5. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.3.f143.
9
Local research ethics committees.当地研究伦理委员会。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):639-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.639.
本文引用的文献
1
Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel.完全知情同意可能会无端地残忍。
BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1199-201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1199.
2
The scandal of poor medical research.糟糕的医学研究丑闻。
BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):283-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283.
3
Local research ethics committees. Widely differing responses to a national survey protocol.地方研究伦理委员会。对一项全国性调查方案的反应大相径庭。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):150-4.
4
Are ethical committees reliable?伦理委员会可靠吗？
J R Soc Med. 1995 Jan;88(1):31-3.
5
Local research ethics committees: hindrance or help?地方研究伦理委员会：阻碍还是助力？
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Jan;102(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09015.x.
6
The trouble with ethics committees.伦理委员会的问题。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):102-4.
Zotero 插件