Suppr超能文献

与最佳口腔健康结果相关的研究问题。

Research issues related to optimal oral health outcomes.

作者信息

Dolan T A

机构信息

Department of Community Dentistry, University of Florida College of Dentistry, Gainesville 32610-0404, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1995 Nov;33(11 Suppl):NS106-22. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199511001-00011.

Abstract

Patient outcomes form one part of the classic triad used to define quality of care: structure, process, and outcome. Outcomes research in dentistry should focus on global questions such as: What difference does dental care make to a patient? Do patients derive perceptible benefits from their dental care? What dental treatments work the best? Like programs or other courses of action, treatment outcomes are considered on three levels: the policy level, which asks, "Are we doing the right things for our target population, given our resources?" program evaluation, in which specific program objectives are set in terms of achievement or maintenance of certain rates and measures; and the individual patient level, in which specific physiologic, psychological, and sociological measures are used to determine individual treatment outcomes. Each level of evaluation can use treatment outcomes or oral health status measures as evaluation criteria. Clinicians routinely face the challenge of providing "appropriate" care to older veterans--a concept that considers the accuracy of risk assessment and diagnosis as well as treatment outcomes (such as the relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alternative treatment strategies, together with the short- and longer-term physiologic and psychological results). Outcomes research is even more challenging when considering its application in older populations whose physical, social, and psychological health are increasingly interrelated and variable with age. Thus, outcomes research, and particularly research on the appropriateness of care, must consider the values and preferences (utility) of those outcomes for older veterans and their families. Optimal oral health outcomes can be achieved through invigorated oral health services research to better understand patients' preferences related to dental treatment decisions, to define oral health outcomes incorporating these preferences, and to assess the effectiveness of the current dental delivery system and its various components, including the appropriate mix of dental providers and allied health personnel, emerging technologies, and innovative prevention and health promotion strategies. An administrative structure and incentives should be established to support dental health services and outcomes research within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). A dental service network with an oversight board could be established to evaluate issues related to treatment outcomes. Alternatively, a Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center devoted to the improvement of the quality of VA dental care and the oral health care delivery system could be established.

摘要

患者治疗结果是用于定义医疗质量的经典三元组的一部分

结构、过程和结果。牙科领域的结果研究应聚焦于全局性问题,例如:牙科护理对患者有何影响?患者是否从其牙科护理中获得明显益处?哪种牙科治疗效果最佳?与项目或其他行动方案一样,治疗结果从三个层面进行考量:政策层面,该层面会问“鉴于我们的资源,我们是否在为目标人群做正确的事?”;项目评估,在项目评估中,根据某些比率和指标的达成或维持情况设定具体的项目目标;以及个体患者层面,在该层面使用特定的生理、心理和社会学指标来确定个体治疗结果。每个评估层面都可将治疗结果或口腔健康状况指标用作评估标准。临床医生经常面临为老年退伍军人提供“恰当”护理的挑战——这一概念既要考虑风险评估和诊断的准确性,也要考虑治疗结果(如替代治疗策略的相对有效性和成本效益,以及短期和长期的生理和心理结果)。当考虑将结果研究应用于身体、社会和心理健康随年龄增长而日益相互关联且多变的老年人群体时,结果研究更具挑战性。因此,结果研究,尤其是关于护理适宜性的研究,必须考虑这些结果对老年退伍军人及其家庭的价值和偏好(效用)。通过加强口腔健康服务研究,以更好地了解患者在牙科治疗决策方面的偏好,定义纳入这些偏好的口腔健康结果,并评估当前牙科服务体系及其各个组成部分的有效性,包括牙科服务提供者和相关健康人员的适当组合、新兴技术以及创新的预防和健康促进策略,可以实现最佳的口腔健康结果。应建立一种行政结构和激励机制,以支持退伍军人事务部(VA)内部的牙科健康服务和结果研究。可以设立一个设有监督委员会 的牙科服务网络,以评估与治疗结果相关的问题。或者,可以设立一个致力于提高VA牙科护理质量和口腔健康服务体系的老年研究教育与临床中心。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验