Suppr超能文献

[85岁及以上老年人的流感疫苗接种:老年人及家庭医生接种或不接种的动机]

[Influenza vaccine in 85-and-over aged: motivation of elderly and family physicians to vaccinate or not].

作者信息

van Haaren K M, van den Brande K J, Dekker F W, Ligthart G J, Springer M P

机构信息

Vakgroep Huisartsgeneeskunde, Rijksuniversiteit, Leiden.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1995 Oct 21;139(42):2144-8.

PMID:7477579
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine on what grounds persons over 85 years are or are not vaccinated against influenza.

DESIGN

Descriptive.

SETTING

Gerontological Research Centre and Department of General Practice Medicine, University of Leiden, the Netherlands.

METHOD

A random sample (n = 331) of the general population of Leiden aged 85 years or older and not institutionalized were interviewed. Early in October 1993, 163 interviews were suitable for analysis (response rate 54%). An analysis of non-responders revealed no significant difference as regards gender and housing, but persons aged 90 and older were under-represented. The general practitioners (n = 41) of the 163 elderly persons were interviewed about these persons (response: n = 127; 78%) and about influenza vaccination in general (response: n = 33; 82%).

RESULTS

The vaccination coverage rates were 51% according to the elderly and 56% according to the GPs; those of elderly people with an indication (48% according to themselves and 64% according to the GP) 52% and 67%, respectively. Reasons for elderly people not to accept vaccination were that they considered vaccination unnecessary, that they felt well and wanted to avoid possible adverse effects. A doctor's recommendation to have vaccination done was a positive influence. GPs' motives not to vaccinate were absence of an indication and the elderly person's wish.

CONCLUSION

Only two-thirds of those over 85 not living in a nursing home with an indication for influenza vaccination were indeed vaccinated. Information about the possible damage done by influenza and about the pros and cons of vaccination, together with a doctor's advice to be vaccinated appeared to have a positive effect on the vaccination coverage.

摘要

目的

确定85岁及以上人群接种或未接种流感疫苗的依据。

设计

描述性研究。

地点

荷兰莱顿大学老年医学研究中心和全科医学系。

方法

对莱顿市85岁及以上未入住机构的普通人群进行随机抽样(n = 331)访谈。1993年10月初,163份访谈适合进行分析(应答率54%)。对未应答者的分析显示,在性别和居住情况方面无显著差异,但90岁及以上的人群代表性不足。对这163名老年人的41名全科医生就这些老年人进行了访谈(应答:n = 127;78%),并就流感疫苗接种总体情况进行了访谈(应答:n = 33;82%)。

结果

老年人报告的疫苗接种覆盖率为51%,全科医生报告的为56%;有接种指征的老年人的覆盖率分别为52%(自我报告)和67%(全科医生报告)。老年人不接受接种的原因是他们认为接种不必要、感觉良好且想避免可能的不良反应。医生建议接种有积极影响。全科医生不建议接种的动机是无接种指征和老年人的意愿。

结论

在85岁以上未住在养老院且有流感疫苗接种指征的人群中,只有三分之二实际接种了疫苗。关于流感可能造成的损害以及接种疫苗的利弊信息,再加上医生的接种建议,似乎对疫苗接种覆盖率有积极影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验