Cserni G, Serényi P, Domján L, Lehoczki N
Bács-Kiskun Megyei Onkormányzat Kórháza, Kecskemét, Pathologia.
Orv Hetil. 1995 Oct 8;136(41):2225-30.
Demonstration of Helicobacter pylori infection receives more and more importance in nowadays gastroenterological practice. The authors have compared culture and histology from 69 antral biopsy specimens for their ability to document Helicobacter pylori infection. Infection ratios in the context of clinical and histological diagnoses resulted in a distribution pattern similar to that described by others: 85-69% of duodenal ulcer patients, 67-67% of gastric ulcer patients, 62-54% of patients with gastritis and/or erosion(s) and 33-60% of endoscopically negative patients were found to be Helicobacter pylori positive with culture and histology respectively. Normal or atrophic mucosa showed no bacteria with either methods, but one must also consider the small number of such cases in this study. Chronic gastritis with no signs of activity proved to be infected only in a minority of cases, while chronic active gastritis cases were Helicobacter pylori positive in 72 and 61% histologically and with culture respectively. The modified Giemsa stain used in this study grave a relative specificity of 0.74 and sensitivity of 0.79 as compared with culture. There was a good association between the two methods tested, and this could be further improved by doing the two tests simultaneously. The association was weaker when the tests were done asynchronously, this is why it is not recommended to use such a diagnostic schedule. Comparison of the traditional haematoxylin-eosin stain with the modified Giemsa stain resulted in a very strong association between the two.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在当今的胃肠病学实践中,幽门螺杆菌感染的检测越来越受到重视。作者比较了69份胃窦活检标本的培养和组织学检查结果,以评估它们记录幽门螺杆菌感染的能力。根据临床和组织学诊断得出的感染率分布模式与其他人描述的相似:十二指肠溃疡患者中,培养和组织学检查发现幽门螺杆菌阳性的比例分别为85%-69%;胃溃疡患者为67%-67%;胃炎和/或糜烂患者为62%-54%;内镜检查阴性患者为33%-60%。正常或萎缩性黏膜在两种检查方法下均未发现细菌,但本研究中此类病例数量较少。无活动迹象的慢性胃炎仅在少数病例中被证实感染,而慢性活动性胃炎病例中,组织学检查和培养发现幽门螺杆菌阳性的比例分别为72%和61%。本研究中使用的改良吉姆萨染色与培养相比,相对特异性为0.74,敏感性为0.79。两种检测方法之间存在良好的相关性,同时进行这两种检测可进一步提高相关性。当异步进行检测时,相关性较弱,这就是不建议采用这种诊断方案的原因。传统苏木精-伊红染色与改良吉姆萨染色的比较结果显示,两者之间存在很强的相关性。(摘要截于250字)