Suppr超能文献

我们能否更有效地针对吸烟群体?一项针对男性和女性重度吸烟者的研究。

Can we target smoking groups more effectively? A study of male and female heavy smokers.

作者信息

Wilson D, Taylor A, Roberts L

机构信息

Behavioural Epidemiology Unit, South Australian Health Commission, Adelaide.

出版信息

Prev Med. 1995 Jul;24(4):363-8. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1059.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years a number of studies have examined subgroups within the smoking population. These studies have provided information which facilitate improved targeting of programs and interventions to help smokers quit. Despite this there have been few population studies which have described male and female heavy smokers and compared their characteristics.

METHODS

We used representative population data on 789 smokers to examine differences between light and heavy smokers of each gender and between male and female heavy smokers directly.

RESULTS

Of those who smoked, 35% of males and 24% of females were classified as heavy smokers and represent a large target group within the smoking population. Whereas a light smoker was characterized as smoking a median of 12.5 cigarettes per day, the heavy smoker smoked a median of 32 cigarettes per day. Univariate comparison of heavy smokers and light smokers showed a number of statistically significant differences according to demographics, in smoking behaviors and knowledge, in beliefs about smoking, in smoking characteristics, and in other health indicators. Because of interactions between gender and work/leisure day smoking variation, separate logistic regression models based on gender were fitted to the data. Again, compared with light smokers, several significant differences emerged for both heavy female and heavy male smokers under the headings mentioned above. Further logistic regression analyses showed differences between male and female heavy smokers when compared directly.

CONCLUSIONS

The smoking population of South Australia is not homogeneous and this segmentation study has shown the need for varying approaches to different segments when developing intervention programs.

摘要

背景

近年来,多项研究对吸烟人群中的亚组进行了调查。这些研究提供的信息有助于更精准地制定项目和干预措施,以帮助吸烟者戒烟。尽管如此,很少有针对总体人群的研究描述过男性和女性重度吸烟者并比较他们的特征。

方法

我们使用了789名吸烟者的代表性总体人群数据,直接研究每种性别的轻度和重度吸烟者之间以及男性和女性重度吸烟者之间的差异。

结果

在吸烟者中,35%的男性和24%的女性被归类为重度吸烟者,他们是吸烟人群中的一个庞大目标群体。轻度吸烟者的特征是每天平均吸烟12.5支,而重度吸烟者每天平均吸烟32支。对重度吸烟者和轻度吸烟者的单变量比较显示,在人口统计学、吸烟行为和知识、对吸烟的看法、吸烟特征以及其他健康指标方面存在一些具有统计学意义的差异。由于性别与工作日/休闲日吸烟差异之间存在相互作用,因此根据性别对数据拟合了单独的逻辑回归模型。同样,与轻度吸烟者相比,重度女性和重度男性吸烟者在上述标题下都出现了一些显著差异。进一步的逻辑回归分析显示,直接比较时男性和女性重度吸烟者之间存在差异。

结论

南澳大利亚州的吸烟人群并非同质化,这项细分研究表明,在制定干预项目时,需要针对不同细分群体采取不同方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验