Wilson D, Parsons J, Wakefield M
South Australian Department of Human Services, Centre for Population Studies, Epidemiology Branch, Rundle Mall SA, 5000, Australia.
Prev Med. 1999 Sep;29(3):139-44. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0523.
Health related quality-of-life is recognized as an important health outcome measure; how ever, it may also have a significant application in smoking reduction and cessation programs.
Representative population data (n = 3010) was used to compare the quality-of-life status of differ ent smoking categories with never smokers.
Statistically significant differences in mean quality-of-life scores, as measured by the SF-36 health status questionnaire, were observed between never smokers, as the reference group, ex-smokers, all smokers, and light, moderate, and heavy smokers. Heavy smokers also scored significantly lower than both other groups of smokers, scoring as low as the 29th percentile of the population on the general health dimension and lower than the 36th percentile of the population on all the mental health dimensions.
The design of public health smoking cessation programs should consider the varying characteristics of different segments of the smoking population. The advantages of improved quality-of-life may strengthen the argument for encouraging heavier smokers to become light smokers as a precursor to total cessation.
健康相关生活质量被视为一项重要的健康结果指标;然而,它在减少吸烟和戒烟项目中可能也有重要应用。
使用代表性人群数据(n = 3010)来比较不同吸烟类别与从不吸烟者的生活质量状况。
以SF - 36健康状况问卷衡量,作为参照组的从不吸烟者、已戒烟者、所有吸烟者以及轻度、中度和重度吸烟者之间,平均生活质量得分存在统计学上的显著差异。重度吸烟者的得分也显著低于其他两组吸烟者,在总体健康维度上低至人群的第29百分位数,在所有心理健康维度上均低于人群的第36百分位数。
公共卫生戒烟项目的设计应考虑吸烟人群不同细分群体的不同特征。生活质量改善的优势可能会加强鼓励重度吸烟者先成为轻度吸烟者作为完全戒烟前奏的理由。