Suppr超能文献

[开胸术后布比卡因胸膜外镇痛与胸膜内镇痛的比较]

[Comparison of extrapleural and intrapleural analgesia with bupivacaine after thoracotomy].

作者信息

Alaya M, Auffray J P, Alouini T, Bruguerolles B, Romdhani N, Said R, Ennabli K

机构信息

Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Sehloul, Sousse, Tunisie.

出版信息

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1995;14(3):249-55. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(95)80002-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the analgesic and the ventilatory effects as well as blood concentrations of bupivacaine, administered either in the extrapleural or interpleural space after posterolateral thoracotomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

PATIENTS

Twenty ASA class I and II patients, scheduled for elective thoracic surgery were randomly allocated either in the IP group (catheter inserted into the interpleural space) or the EP group (catheter inserted in extrapleural position, paravertebrally above the posterior parietal pleura).

METHODS

In the catheter, inserted at the Th4 level at the end of the surgical procedure, 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine were injected after full recovery from anaesthesia, with the thoracic drains clamped for 30 min. The injection was repeated every six hours. Pain was evaluated after a deep inspiration with a visual analog scale (VAS), before and 1.3 and 6 hours after the injection. Analgesia was considered as effective if the VAS score at the end of the first hour was less than 30 mm. Otherwise 0.1 mg.kg-1 of morphine was administered subcutaneously. The forced vital capacity (FVC) and the forced expiratory volume one second (FEV1) were measured preoperatively and on 1st (D1) and 2nd postoperative Day (D2). Blood samples for measurements of plasma bupivacaine concentrations were obtained at 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 and 250 min respectively after the first injection.

RESULTS

Bupivacaine provided a more rapid, deep and prolonged analgesia by extrapleural than by interpleural route. Analgesia was effective in 9 patients in EP group vs 4 patients in IP group (P < 0.05). Morphine requirements were 4 +/- 8 mg in EP group vs 17 +/- 10 mg in the IP group (P < 0.05). The FVC and FEV1 values were similarly decreased on D1, but recovery was better in EP group on D2 (P < 0.05). Bupivacaine peak concentrations in plasma were lower in EP group (0.86 +/- 0.42 microgram.mL-1) than in IP group (1.63 +/- 1.44 micrograms.mL-1), however the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Extrapleural administration of bupivacaine provides better analgesia as the anaesthetic agent comes in closer contact with intercostal nerves and with lower risk of loss of agent through the pleural drainage. Therefore its use is recommended preferentially over the interpleural route for analgesia after posterolateral thoracotomy.

摘要

目的

比较后侧开胸术后在胸膜外或胸膜间隙给予布比卡因的镇痛效果、通气效应以及血药浓度。

研究设计

随机临床试验。

患者

20例拟行择期胸外科手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级患者,随机分为IP组(导管插入胸膜间隙)或EP组(导管插入胸膜外位置,在后壁胸膜上方的椎旁)。

方法

手术结束时在T4水平插入导管,麻醉完全恢复后,夹闭胸腔引流管30分钟,注入20毫升0.5%布比卡因。每6小时重复注射一次。在深吸气后,于注射前、注射后1.3小时和6小时用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛。如果第一小时末VAS评分小于30毫米,则认为镇痛有效。否则皮下注射0.1毫克/千克吗啡。术前以及术后第1天(D1)和第2天(D2)测量用力肺活量(FVC)和一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)。首次注射后分别于5、10、20、30、60、90、120、150、180和250分钟采集血样测定血浆布比卡因浓度。

结果

胸膜外途径给予布比卡因的镇痛起效更快、更深且持续时间更长。EP组9例患者镇痛有效,而IP组为4例(P<0.05)。EP组吗啡需求量为4±8毫克,而IP组为17±10毫克(P<0.05)。D1时FVC和FEV1值同样降低,但EP组在D2时恢复更好(P<0.05)。EP组血浆布比卡因峰值浓度(0.86±0.42微克/毫升)低于IP组(1.63±1.44微克/毫升),然而差异无统计学意义。

结论

胸膜外给予布比卡因可提供更好的镇痛效果,因为麻醉剂与肋间神经接触更紧密,且通过胸膜引流丢失药物的风险更低。因此,对于后侧开胸术后镇痛,推荐优先采用胸膜外途径而非胸膜间途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验