Suppr超能文献

开胸术后疼痛中持续胸膜外肋间神经阻滞与腰椎硬膜外吗啡的对比研究

Comparative study of continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block and lumbar epidural morphine in post-thoracotomy pain.

作者信息

Dauphin A, Lubanska-Hubert E, Young J E, Miller J D, Bennett W F, Fuller H D

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ont.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 1997 Dec;40(6):431-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block with bupivacaine 0.5% in 1:200,000 epinephrine and continuous lumbar epidural block with morphine in controlling post-thoracotomy pain and to measure serum bupivacaine concentrations during extrapleural infusion.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ont., a tertiary care teaching centre.

PATIENTS

Sixty-one patients booked for elective thoracotomy were randomized by scaled envelope to two groups.

INTERVENTIONS

Group A received a continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block with bupivacaine 0.5% in 1:200,000 epinephrine as a bolus of 0.3 mL/kg followed by an infusion of 0.1 mL/kg every hour for 72 hours. Group B received a continuous lumbar epidural block with morphine as a bolus of 70 g/kg followed by an infusion of 7 g/kg every hour for 72 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain was assessed by a linear visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. The cumulative amount of "rescue" intravenous morphine used, and serum bupivacaine concentrations were measured as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Pain control was the same in both groups as assessed by linear VAS score (p = 0.33). The cumulative dose of intravenous morphine for supplemental analgesia was statistically significant between the groups: group A patients used more morphine than group B (p < 0.05). Accumulation of serum bupivacaine was present with no clinical toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in the degree of post-thoracotomy pain control measured by the VAS score when analgesia is provided by continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block with bupivacaine 0.5% in 1:200,000 epinephrine or lumbar epidural block with morphine. Larger amounts of rescue analgesia were used by patients in the continuous extrapleural group with bupivacaine than those in the continuous lumbar epidural block with morphine. Serum bupivacaine concentrations rise without clinical toxicity.

摘要

目的

比较0.5%布比卡因与1:200,000肾上腺素混合液持续胸膜外肋间神经阻滞和吗啡持续腰段硬膜外阻滞在控制开胸术后疼痛方面的疗效,并测定胸膜外输注期间血清布比卡因浓度。

设计

一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。

地点

安大略省汉密尔顿市圣约瑟夫医院,一家三级护理教学中心。

患者

61例预定择期开胸手术的患者通过随机数字表法随机分为两组。

干预措施

A组接受0.5%布比卡因与1:200,000肾上腺素混合液持续胸膜外肋间神经阻滞,初始剂量为0.3 mL/kg推注,随后每小时输注0.1 mL/kg,共72小时。B组接受吗啡持续腰段硬膜外阻滞,初始剂量为70 μg/kg推注,随后每小时输注7 μg/kg,共72小时。

主要观察指标

采用线性视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分评估疼痛。测定“补救”静脉注射吗啡的累积用量以及血清布比卡因浓度作为次要观察指标。

结果

通过线性VAS评分评估,两组的疼痛控制情况相同(p = 0.33)。两组间补充镇痛的静脉注射吗啡累积剂量具有统计学差异:A组患者使用的吗啡比B组多(p < 0.05)。血清布比卡因有蓄积,但无临床毒性。

结论

当采用0.5%布比卡因与1:200,000肾上腺素混合液持续胸膜外肋间神经阻滞或吗啡持续腰段硬膜外阻滞进行镇痛时,通过VAS评分测得的开胸术后疼痛控制程度无显著差异。布比卡因持续胸膜外组患者使用的补救性镇痛药物量比吗啡持续腰段硬膜外阻滞组患者多。血清布比卡因浓度升高,但无临床毒性。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验