Fischer B, Haïssaguerre M, Garrigue S, Poquet F, Gencel L, Clémenty J
Hôpital cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1995 Feb;88(2):205-12.
The object of this study was to assess the efficacy and risks of radiofrequency ablation of common atrial flutter and to determine the optimal site of ablation in a large population of patients. Three different methods were used to determine the site of ablation: the first was anatomical and electrophysiological whilst the two others were based essentially on anatomical landmarks for localising the critical zone of the reentry circuit. Recent studies report that radiofrequency ablation is effective in interrupting and preventing recurrences of common atrial flutter both by using anatomical and electrophysiological methods. Nevertheless, a larger series of patients was necessary to establish the efficacy and to determine the optimal site of ablation. A series of 110 consecutive patients with common atrial flutter resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs was studied. The site of ablation of the first 50 patients was determined using both anatomical landmarks and electrophysiological parameters. The anatomical zones were: zone 1, between the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve and the orifice of the inferior vena cava; zone 2, between the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve and the ostium of the coronary sinus, and zone 3: between the orifice of the inferior vena cava and the ostium of the coronary sinus. The electrophysiological criterion was an endocavitary auriculogramme occurring during the plateau phase preceding the F wave of the flutter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目的是评估射频消融治疗常见心房扑动的疗效和风险,并确定大量患者的最佳消融部位。采用三种不同方法确定消融部位:第一种是解剖学和电生理学方法,另外两种主要基于解剖学标志来定位折返环路的关键区域。近期研究报告称,通过解剖学和电生理学方法,射频消融在中断和预防常见心房扑动复发方面均有效。然而,需要更大规模的患者系列研究来确定疗效并确定最佳消融部位。对110例连续的对抗心律失常药物耐药的常见心房扑动患者进行了研究。前50例患者的消融部位通过解剖学标志和电生理学参数确定。解剖学区域包括:区域1,位于三尖瓣隔叶与下腔静脉口之间;区域2,位于三尖瓣隔叶与冠状窦口之间;区域3,位于下腔静脉口与冠状窦口之间。电生理学标准是在扑动F波之前的平台期出现的腔内心房电图。(摘要截选至250词)