Manome Y, Wen P Y, Hershowitz A, Tanaka T, Rollins B J, Kufe D W, Fine H A
Division of Cancer Pharmacology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1995 Oct;41(4):227-35. doi: 10.1007/BF01516997.
Recently, there has been renewed interest in the concept of tumor vaccines using genetically engineered tumor cells expressing a variety of cytokines to increase their immunogenicity. Human MCP-1 (JE) is a potent chemoattractant and activator of monocytes and T lymphocytes and thus a good candidate gene for a tumor vaccine. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of vaccines consisting of irradiated tumor cells transduced with the murine MCP-1 gene in the syngeneic 9L gliosarcoma brain tumor model. 9L cell lines stably expressing murine MCP-1 (9L-JE) and control cell lines expressing neomycin 3' phosphotransferase (9L-Neo) were generated by infection with a Moloney murine leukemia retroviral vector. Fisher 344 rats were immunized with intradermal injections of 5 x 10(5) or 2 x 10(6) irradiated (5000 cGy) 9L-JE, 9L-Neo, and wild-type 9L (9L-WT) cells. Two weeks later immunized and non-immunized animals were challenged with various doses of intradermal (5 x 10(6)-5 x 10(7) or intracerebral (2 x 10(4)-5 x 10(5) 9L-WT cells. Intradermal tumors grew in all non-immunized animals. No tumors grew in animals immunized with irradiated 9L-JE or 9L-Neo cells and challenged with inocula of fewer than 5 x 10(5) 9L-WT cells. With higher inocula up to 10(7) cells, tumors appeared in all the animals, but subsequently regressed in the immunized animals. Tumors in animals immunized with 9L-JE were always smaller than tumors in the other groups. In addition, only the 9L-JE vaccine protected against tumor inocula of 5 x 10(7) cells. Thus vaccination with MCP-1-expressing cells was able to protect animals against at least a 100-fold larger number of challenge tumor cells than vaccination with control cells. In contrast to studies with intradermal tumors, immunization with 9L-JE and 9L-Neo produced only minimal protection against intracerebral tumors. There was no significant difference between the 9L-JE and 9L-Neo vaccines in intracerebral challenge. This study suggests that tumor vaccines expressing cytokine genes such as MCP-1 can increase the antitumor response. However, the protective effect of these vaccines appears to be largely limited to intradermal tumors rather than intracerebral tumors.
最近,利用表达多种细胞因子的基因工程肿瘤细胞来提高其免疫原性的肿瘤疫苗概念重新引起了人们的关注。人MCP-1(JE)是一种有效的单核细胞和T淋巴细胞趋化因子及激活剂,因此是肿瘤疫苗的一个良好候选基因。我们因此在同基因9L胶质肉瘤脑肿瘤模型中评估了用鼠MCP-1基因转导的经辐射的肿瘤细胞组成的疫苗的疗效。通过用莫洛尼鼠白血病逆转录病毒载体感染,产生了稳定表达鼠MCP-1的9L细胞系(9L-JE)和表达新霉素3'磷酸转移酶的对照细胞系(9L-Neo)。用5×10⁵或2×10⁶经辐射(5000 cGy)的9L-JE、9L-Neo和野生型9L(9L-WT)细胞皮内注射免疫Fisher 344大鼠。两周后,对免疫和未免疫的动物用不同剂量的皮内(5×10⁶ - 5×10⁷)或脑内(2×10⁴ - 5×10⁵)9L-WT细胞进行攻击。所有未免疫的动物皮内肿瘤均生长。用经辐射的9L-JE或9L-Neo细胞免疫并用少于5×10⁵个9L-WT细胞接种物攻击的动物未出现肿瘤生长。接种物高达10⁷个细胞时,所有动物均出现肿瘤,但随后免疫动物的肿瘤消退。用9L-JE免疫的动物的肿瘤总是比其他组的肿瘤小。此外,只有9L-JE疫苗能保护动物抵抗5×10⁷个细胞的肿瘤接种。因此,与用对照细胞接种相比,用表达MCP-1的细胞接种能够保护动物抵抗至少100倍数量更多的攻击肿瘤细胞。与皮内肿瘤的研究不同,用9L-JE和9L-Neo免疫对脑内肿瘤仅产生最小程度的保护。在脑内攻击中,9L-JE和9L-Neo疫苗之间没有显著差异。这项研究表明,表达细胞因子基因如MCP-1的肿瘤疫苗可以增强抗肿瘤反应。然而,这些疫苗的保护作用似乎在很大程度上限于皮内肿瘤而非脑内肿瘤。