Geiger A M, Foxman B, Sobel J D
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Genitourin Med. 1995 Oct;71(5):304-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.5.304.
Although as many as 5% of all women complain of chronic vulvovaginitis, little is known about these women. They may often be misdiagnosed and the role of vaginal yeast culture in diagnosing vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) among them has not been clearly defined.
To address these deficiencies, we tabulated initial diagnoses among new patients and conducted a medical record-based, unmatched case-control study among women reporting a history of chronic vulvovaginitis (four or more episodes in the past year) at a vulvovaginitis specialty clinic. Clinical presentation and medical history were compared for women who had a positive vaginal yeast culture for either Candida albicans or C glabrata, or who had a negative culture.
One-third of the women had no apparent vulvovaginal disease at their initial visit. All women reported similar symptoms, except for an increased prevalence of painful sexual intercourse in women with C albicans (chi 2 p = 0.014 versus women with C glabrata and p < 0.001 versus women with no candida). Women with C glabrata were more likely to be non-white (chi 2 p = 0.071 compared with women with C albicans) and to report an underlying medical condition (chi 2 p < or = 0.001 versus both women with C albicans and women with no candida). Physical examination was normal only in women with no candida. C albicans cases were more likely to have positive potassium hydroxide microscopy (chi 2 p = 0.016) and a pH < or = 4.5 (chi 2 p = 0.011) than were C glabrata cases.
These results suggest that reliance on symptoms and signs alone will result in significant misdiagnosis of chronic vulvovaginitis. Among women with VVC, subtle differences in clinical presentation do not reliably distinguish women with C albicans from those with C glabrata. Our study also indicates that vaginal yeast cultures, while not necessary for every patient, are valuable in confirming negative diagnoses, detecting microscopy false-negatives, and identifying non-C albicans isolates.
尽管高达5%的女性抱怨患有慢性外阴阴道炎,但对这些女性的了解却很少。她们可能经常被误诊,而且阴道酵母菌培养在诊断她们中的外阴阴道念珠菌病(VVC)方面的作用尚未明确界定。
为了解决这些不足,我们将新患者的初始诊断制成表格,并在一家外阴阴道炎专科诊所对报告有慢性外阴阴道炎病史(过去一年中发作四次或更多次)的女性进行了一项基于病历的非匹配病例对照研究。比较了白色念珠菌或光滑念珠菌阴道酵母菌培养呈阳性或培养呈阴性的女性的临床表现和病史。
三分之一的女性在初次就诊时没有明显的外阴阴道疾病。所有女性报告的症状相似,只是白色念珠菌感染的女性性交疼痛的发生率更高(与光滑念珠菌感染的女性相比,χ² p = 0.014;与无念珠菌感染的女性相比,p < 0.001)。光滑念珠菌感染的女性更有可能是非白人(与白色念珠菌感染的女性相比,χ² p = 0.071),并且报告有潜在的疾病(与白色念珠菌感染的女性和无念珠菌感染的女性相比,χ² p ≤ 0.001)。仅无念珠菌感染的女性体格检查正常。白色念珠菌病例比光滑念珠菌病例更有可能氢氧化钾显微镜检查呈阳性(χ² p = 0.016)且pH ≤ 4.5(χ² p = 0.011)。
这些结果表明,仅依靠症状和体征会导致慢性外阴阴道炎的大量误诊。在VVC女性中,临床表现的细微差异不能可靠地区分白色念珠菌感染的女性和光滑念珠菌感染的女性。我们的研究还表明,阴道酵母菌培养虽然并非对每个患者都必要,但在确认阴性诊断、检测显微镜检查假阴性以及鉴定非白色念珠菌分离株方面很有价值。