Berg A O, Heidrich F E, Fihn S D, Bergman J J, Wood R W, Stamm W E, Holmes K K
JAMA. 1984 Feb 3;251(5):620-5.
We conducted a prospective study comparing the diagnostic yield of standard clinical examinations and of comprehensive microbiological studies in establishing the etiology of genitourinary (GU) symptoms and the prevalence of GU tract infections in 204 women seen in a university-based family practice. Two thirds were initially seen with GU symptoms and one third were seen for routine examinations. In each case we obtained demographic and historical information, a physical examination, and a variety of laboratory tests, including research procedures not commonly available. Diagnoses considered were urinary tract infection and sterile pyuria; trichomonal, yeast, and nonspecific vaginitis; and GU tract infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, or herpes simplex virus. Using strategies commonly employed in practice, we reached a diagnosis in only 34% of symptomatic women, a figure rising to 66% when selected, nonroutine laboratory examinations were added.
我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较标准临床检查和全面微生物学研究在确定204名在大学附属医院家庭医疗科就诊的女性泌尿生殖系统(GU)症状病因及GU感染患病率方面的诊断效果。三分之二的女性最初因GU症状就诊,三分之一因常规检查就诊。在每个病例中,我们收集了人口统计学和病史信息、进行了体格检查,并开展了各种实验室检测,包括一些不常用的研究性检测。考虑的诊断包括尿路感染和无菌性脓尿;滴虫性、霉菌性和非特异性阴道炎;以及由淋病奈瑟菌、沙眼衣原体或单纯疱疹病毒引起的GU感染。采用实践中常用的方法,我们仅对34%有症状的女性做出了诊断,当增加特定的非常规实验室检查后,这一数字升至66%。