Gnoth C, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G, Kunert J, Godehardt E
NFP Study Group, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
Adv Contracept. 1995 Jun;11(2):173-85. doi: 10.1007/BF01987282.
For 10 years, a prospective study has been taking place in Germany to examine the use of natural family planning (NFP). As natural methods are behavioral methods, use-effectiveness, acceptability and continuation rates are very much influenced by patterns of sexual behavior. Therefore we performed an analysis of the sexual behavior of NFP users. Out of the data base of 1211 clients and 12,591 cycles we could identify a group of 300 women, all NFP beginners, with 5900 contraceptive cycles, who contributed at least 12 cycles with reliable recording of their sexual activity. Different groups were analyzed with methods of analysis of variance and regression models to find out significant differences in their sexual behavior with respect to sociodemographic structure and time of use. Nearly half of all the women systematically combine the fertility awareness part of NFP with other family planning methods. They use barriers in more than 60% of their cycles. The other half never or only in about 7% of their cycles use additional barrier methods. The latter show a clear decrease in barrier use in the course of time, whereas the frequent barrier users constantly combine the advantages of two family planning methods. Regarding the frequency of intercourse they are the sexually more active ones and show distinct sociodemographic characteristics. We could confirm the existence of three groups of NFP users, which differ significantly in their use of NFP as a family planning method. Despite these differences the low pregnancy rates indicate the conscious and risk-related sexual behavior of the group members.
十年来,德国一直在进行一项前瞻性研究,以考察自然计划生育(NFP)的使用情况。由于自然方法属于行为方法,其使用效果、可接受性和持续使用率在很大程度上受到性行为模式的影响。因此,我们对NFP使用者的性行为进行了分析。在1211名客户和12591个周期的数据库中,我们确定了一组300名女性,她们都是NFP新手,有5900个避孕周期,且至少有12个周期可靠记录了她们的性活动。我们运用方差分析方法和回归模型对不同组进行分析,以找出她们在性行为方面,就社会人口结构和使用时间而言的显著差异。几乎一半的女性系统性地将NFP的生育意识部分与其他计划生育方法相结合。她们在超过60%的周期中使用屏障避孕法。另一半女性从不使用或仅在约7%的周期中使用额外的屏障避孕法。后者在使用过程中屏障避孕法的使用明显减少,而频繁使用屏障避孕法的女性则不断结合两种计划生育方法的优点。就性交频率而言,她们是性方面更为活跃的人群,且呈现出明显的社会人口特征。我们能够确认存在三组NFP使用者,她们在将NFP用作计划生育方法的使用情况上存在显著差异。尽管存在这些差异,但低怀孕率表明该组成员具有自觉且与风险相关的性行为。