Suppr超能文献

采用新型1型和2型人类免疫缺陷病毒自动化微粒酶免疫测定法检测1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抗体

Detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 antibodies by new automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay for HIV types 1 and 2.

作者信息

Matter L, Germann D

机构信息

Institute for Medical Microbiology, University of Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2338-41. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2338-2341.1995.

Abstract

We compared an automated microparticle double-antigen sandwich enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the IMx test system recently developed by Abbott with two established assays (the automated indirect Vidas IgG EIA and the double-antigen sandwich EIA from Murex/Wellcome) devised for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 antibodies. A total of 1,078 consecutive serum samples were tested prospectively with the three assays. In addition, we used retrospectively selected panels of serum samples with discrepant results in two different screening tests and with indeterminate or positive Western immunoblot (WB) results, as well as five commercially available HIV-1 seroconversion panels. The new assay showed excellent discriminatory characteristics for the separation of samples from HIV-1-positive and HIV-1-negative persons according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WB criteria. The sensitivities were 98.1, 92.9, and 96.1% for the new test and the two other assays, respectively, and the specificities were 99.7, 97.9, and 98.1%, respectively. With the seroconversion panels this new test was positive several days earlier than the two other assays; i.e., seroconversion was evident at the peak of p24 antigenemia and often several weeks before WB became positive by the most stringent criteria.

摘要

我们将雅培公司最近开发的用于IMx检测系统的自动化微粒双抗原夹心酶免疫测定法(EIA)与另外两种用于检测1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)和HIV-2抗体的既定测定法(自动化间接Vidas IgG EIA以及Murex/Wellcome公司的双抗原夹心EIA)进行了比较。对1078份连续血清样本进行了这三种测定法的前瞻性检测。此外,我们回顾性地选择了血清样本组,这些样本在两种不同的筛查试验中结果不一致,以及在蛋白质印迹法(WB)检测中结果不确定或呈阳性,另外还包括五个市售的HIV-1血清转化样本组。根据疾病控制与预防中心的WB标准,新的测定法在区分HIV-1阳性和HIV-1阴性人员的样本方面显示出优异的鉴别特性。新检测法以及另外两种检测法的灵敏度分别为98.1%、92.9%和96.1%,特异性分别为99.7%、97.9%和98.1%。在血清转化样本组中,这种新检测法比另外两种检测法早几天呈阳性;也就是说,在p24抗原血症高峰时血清转化明显,而且通常在WB根据最严格标准呈阳性前几周就已出现。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Peptide-based antibody detection for tuberculosis diagnosis.用于结核病诊断的基于肽的抗体检测
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009 Jan;16(1):49-54. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00334-08. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

本文引用的文献

2
Epstein-Barr virus infection in HIV-positive patients.HIV阳性患者的爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒感染
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Aug;12(8):601-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01973638.
9
[Laboratory diagnosis in HIV infection].[HIV感染的实验室诊断]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1991 Aug 24;121(34):1183-6.
10
The fallibility of HIV western blot.艾滋病病毒免疫印迹法的易误性。
Lancet. 1991 Feb 2;337(8736):286-7. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90884-r.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验