Chesnut R M
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
New Horiz. 1995 Aug;3(3):581-93.
The comparative efficacy of various treatment algorithms in improving outcome from severe head injury (SHI) has never been tested in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Indeed, there are few hard data on the influence on outcome of most of the individual treatment modalities used alone. The medical management algorithm presented here is an exercise in evaluating the strength of what studies do exist and attempting to balance the relative risk/benefit ratios of the various treatment modalities. This algorithm, based on the information contained in this issue of New Horizons, divides the patient's course into two segments based on the insertion of an intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor. Before the establishment of ICP monitoring, based on the devastating effects of secondary insults on the injured brain, the main emphasis should be on full resuscitation of the patient. Any "prophylactic" treatment of the intracranial injury that has the potential of interfering with full resuscitation (e.g., mannitol) or inducing secondary ischemic insults (e.g., hyperventilation) should be reserved for the specific instance of evidence of herniation or neurologic deterioration; if such deterioration should occur, however, it should be promptly treated. Following computed tomography imaging and any necessary surgical procedures, and ICP monitor should be inserted and treatment directed specifically toward controlling ICP and maintaining a cerebral perfusion pressure > or = 70 mm Hg. An algorithm for treating intracranial hypertension is presented, based on the successive application of effective agents with increasing attendant risks. Outside of the burgeoning pharmacologic approaches to the injured brain, the future of the management of SHI involves: a) subjecting the various protocols and treatment modalities presently in use to prospective, randomized, controlled trials in order to formally establish their utility; b) developing organized, regionalized trauma care systems which facilitate the universal delivery of the level of care necessary to effectively apply today's head injury management protocols; and c) furthering our development of targeted therapy in treating SHI. Targeted therapy involves recognizing and understanding the various pathophysiologic processes that occur in the injured brain over the acute course of treatment and the responses of these processes to various treatment modalities. Such processes include vasogenic and cytotoxic edema, increased cerebral blood volume, altered cerebrovascular autoregulation, vasospasm, etc.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
各种治疗方案对改善重度颅脑损伤(SHI)预后的比较疗效,从未在前瞻性、随机、对照试验中得到检验。事实上,关于大多数单独使用的个体治疗方式对预后影响的确切数据很少。本文提出的医疗管理方案是一项对现有研究力度进行评估,并试图平衡各种治疗方式相对风险/获益比的工作。该方案基于本期《新视野》中的信息,根据颅内压(ICP)监测仪的置入情况,将患者病程分为两个阶段。在建立ICP监测之前,鉴于继发性损伤对受伤大脑的毁灭性影响,主要重点应是对患者进行充分复苏。任何可能干扰充分复苏(如甘露醇)或引发继发性缺血性损伤(如过度通气)的颅内损伤“预防性”治疗,应仅用于出现脑疝或神经功能恶化证据的特定情况;然而,如果发生这种恶化,应立即进行治疗。在计算机断层扫描成像及任何必要的外科手术后,应置入ICP监测仪,并针对性地进行治疗,以控制ICP并维持脑灌注压≥70mmHg。本文提出了一种治疗颅内高压的方案,该方案基于依次应用风险递增的有效药物。除了针对受伤大脑的新兴药物治疗方法外,SHI管理的未来方向包括:a)对目前使用的各种方案和治疗方式进行前瞻性、随机、对照试验,以正式确定其效用;b)建立有组织、区域化的创伤护理系统,以促进普遍提供有效应用当今颅脑损伤管理方案所需的护理水平;c)进一步发展针对SHI的靶向治疗。靶向治疗包括识别和理解在急性治疗过程中受伤大脑发生的各种病理生理过程,以及这些过程对各种治疗方式的反应。这些过程包括血管源性和细胞毒性水肿、脑血容量增加、脑血管自动调节改变、血管痉挛等。(摘要截选至400字)