Lower extremity burns and Unna paste: can we decrease health care costs without compromising patient care?

OBJECTIVE

To compare an alternative treatment for lower extremity burns with the standard in-hospital treatment, in an attempt to shorten hospital stay.

DESIGN

A case-control series.

SETTING

A university-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients with a burn isolated to a lower extremity were treated over an 8-month period with split-thickness skin grafting (STSG), Unna paste dressing, immediate mobilization and early discharge. This group was compared with matched controls from the preceding 8 years treated with STSG, occlusive burn gauze dressing, bed rest and hospitalization.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Duration of hospital stay and graft viability.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with an average wound size of 131 cm2 were treated with Unna paste and had a graft viability of greater than 95% and a burn-scar rating equivalent to that of patients treated with the earlier regimen. The duration of hospital stay decreased from a mean of 12.9 days to 1.4 days, with no complications. This translated into a saving of $10,350 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This alternative treatment is safe, inexpensive and effective and is recommended as the treatment of choice for uncomplicated, noncircumferential lower extremity burns.