McLeod D H, Wong D H, Vaghadia H, Claridge R J, Merrick P M
Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Can J Anaesth. 1995 Sep;42(9):765-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03011173.
The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative analgesia after foot surgery in patients anaesthetised either with popliteal sciatic nerve block or ankle block. In a prospective study, 40 patients scheduled for foot surgery involving osteotomies were allocated randomly into one of two groups. Following induction of general anaesthesia, Group PS (n = 21) received a lateral popliteal sciatic nerve block and Group AB (n = 19) received an ankle block. Both groups received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plain. In group PS 43% required morphine analgesia in the Post Anaesthetic Recovery Room (PAR) compared with 16% in group AB. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using VAS and a pain scale in the PAR and a questionnaire by telephone follow-up on the day after surgery. The ankle block appeared to be more reliable, providing more consistent analgesia in the PAR. Postoperative analgesia in Group PS lasted a median of 18.0 hr and in Group AB lasted 11.5 hr (P < 0.05). Both techniques provided effective analgesia after discharge home and high levels of patient satisfaction.
本研究的目的是比较在接受腘窝坐骨神经阻滞或踝关节阻滞麻醉的足部手术患者中的术后镇痛效果。在一项前瞻性研究中,40例计划接受涉及截骨术的足部手术的患者被随机分为两组。全身麻醉诱导后,PS组(n = 21)接受外侧腘窝坐骨神经阻滞,AB组(n = 19)接受踝关节阻滞。两组均接受20 ml 0.5%的布比卡因原液。在麻醉后恢复室(PAR)中,PS组43%的患者需要吗啡镇痛,而AB组为16%。术后镇痛在PAR中使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和疼痛量表进行评估,并在术后第一天通过电话随访使用问卷进行评估。踝关节阻滞似乎更可靠,在PAR中提供更持续的镇痛效果。PS组术后镇痛的中位持续时间为18.0小时,AB组为11.5小时(P < 0.05)。两种技术在出院回家后均提供了有效的镇痛效果,且患者满意度较高。