• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式心理健康护理中的风险合同。

Risk contracts in managed mental health care.

作者信息

Frank R G, McGuire T G, Newhouse J P

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard University, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Fall;14(3):50-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.3.50.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.14.3.50
PMID:7498903
Abstract

Private employers and state Medicaid programs are increasingly writing risk contracts with managed behavioral health care companies to manage mental health and substance abuse benefits. This paper analyzes the case for a carve-out program and makes recommendations about the form of the payer-managed behavioral health care contract. Payers should consider using a "soft" capitation contract in which only some of the claims' risk is transferred to the managed behavioral health care company. To avoid incentives to underserve seriously ill persons, we recommend that payers not allow choice by enrollees among risk contractors.

摘要

私营雇主和州医疗补助计划越来越多地与管理式行为健康护理公司签订风险合同,以管理心理健康和药物滥用福利。本文分析了设立独立项目的理由,并就付款人管理的行为健康护理合同的形式提出建议。付款人应考虑使用“软”人头合同,即仅将部分索赔风险转移给管理式行为健康护理公司。为避免产生为病情严重者提供不足服务的动机,我们建议付款人不允许参保人在风险承包商之间进行选择。

相似文献

1
Risk contracts in managed mental health care.管理式心理健康护理中的风险合同。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Fall;14(3):50-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.3.50.
2
Substitution in a Medicaid mental health carve-out: services and costs.医疗补助计划中精神健康专项承保的替代方案:服务与成本
J Health Care Finance. 2002 Summer;28(4):11-23.
3
How does risk sharing between employers and a managed behavioral health organization affect mental health care?雇主与管理式行为健康组织之间的风险分担如何影响心理健康护理?
Health Serv Res. 2000 Oct;35(4):761-76.
4
Savings from a Medicaid carve-out for mental health and substance abuse services in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州医疗补助计划中针对心理健康和药物滥用服务的专项拨款节省的费用。
Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Sep;48(9):1147-52. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.9.1147.
5
Costs and incentives in a behavioral health carve-out.行为健康独立核算中的成本与激励措施。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Mar-Apr;17(2):53-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.53.
6
Managed care risk contracts and substance abuse treatment.管理式医疗风险合同与药物滥用治疗。
Inquiry. 2000 Summer;37(2):219-25.
7
More providers taking risk for Medicaid behavioral health.更多医疗服务提供者承担医疗补助计划行为健康方面的风险。
Public Sect Contract Rep. 1999 Apr;5(4):57-9, 49.
8
Cost-cutting opportunities through direct contracting.
J Health Care Benefits. 1993 Nov-Dec;3(2):57-60.
9
Mental health carve-outs: effects and implications.心理健康专项条款:影响与启示
Med Care Res Rev. 1999;56 Suppl 2:37-59.
10
Beware risk contracts that skimp on behavioral health benefits.谨防那些在行为健康福利方面偷工减料的风险合同。
Capitation Rates Data. 2000 Jan;5(1):9-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovations in Care Delivery for Patients With Serious Mental Illness Among Accountable Care Organizations.负责任的医疗保健组织为严重精神疾病患者提供护理服务的创新。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Aug 1;73(8):889-896. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000484. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
2
Behavioral health carve-outs: Do they impede access or prioritize the neediest?行为健康剥离:它们是阻碍了医疗服务的可及性还是优先满足了最有需求的人群?
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):802-804. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13704. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
3
Contract Design: Financial Options and Risk.
合约设计:金融期权与风险
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jan 12;18(1):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3615.
4
Managed care and provider satisfaction in mental health settings.精神卫生机构中的管理式医疗与提供者满意度。
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Jun;45(3):209-21. doi: 10.1007/s10597-008-9171-6. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
5
QUALITY-CONSTANT "PRICES" FOR THE ONGOING TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY*.精神分裂症持续治疗的质量恒定“价格”:一项探索性研究*
Q Rev Econ Finance. 2004 Jul;44(3):390-409. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2004.05.003.
6
The effect of a medicaid managed care program on patterns of psychiatric readmission among adolescents: evidence from Maryland.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2006 Jan;33(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s11414-005-9004-0.
7
Cost-effectiveness of public sector substance abuse treatment: comparison of a managed care approach to a traditional public sector system.公共部门药物滥用治疗的成本效益:管理式医疗方法与传统公共部门系统的比较。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct-Dec;32(4):409-29. doi: 10.1007/BF02384201.
8
Incentives in a Medicaid carve-out: impact on children with special health care needs.医疗补助专项计划中的激励措施:对有特殊医疗需求儿童的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):79-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00343.x.
9
The sensitivity of substance abuse treatment intensity to co-payment levels.药物滥用治疗强度对共付费用水平的敏感性。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004 Jan-Mar;31(1):50-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02287338.
10
How did the introduction of managed care for the uninsured in Iowa affect the use of substance abuse services?爱荷华州为未参保者引入管理式医疗对药物滥用服务的使用有何影响?
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):26-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02287811.