Desjardins A, Malo J L, L'Archevêque J, Cartier A, McCants M, Lehrer S B
Department of Chest Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur, Montreal, Canada.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995 Nov;96(5 Pt 1):608-17. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70259-8.
To confirm occupational asthma caused by clam and shrimp in a food company worker, the following investigation was planned in 60 other exposed workers (56 participants).
Before the production period of clam and shrimp, a medical and occupational questionnaire was carried out and skin and RAST testing were done with common inhalants and clam, shrimp, crab, and lobster extracts. During the production period, environmental monitoring was performed with personal and general samplers; inhalation testing with methacholine was proposed to subjects with immediate skin reactivity to clam, shrimp, or both. After the production period, all subjects with an immediate skin reactivity to clam, shrimp, or both and either a history of rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, or bronchial hyperresponsiveness were seen by a specialist.
Including the index case in whom occupational asthma to clam and shrimp had been confirmed, four (7%) subjects had a history of rhinoconjunctivitis and two (4%) had a history of asthma during the period of clam production, whereas three (5%) subjects had rhinoconjunctivitis and two (4%) had asthma during the shrimp production. Three (5%) subjects had immediate skin reactivity to clam, and nine (16%) subjects to shrimp. Four (7%) subjects had increased specific IgE antibodies (RAST binding > or = 3%) to clam and eight (14%) to shrimp. Significant associations were found between immunologic reactivity to clam and shrimp on the one hand and to crab and lobster on the other. Environmental monitoring demonstrated clam and shrimp on the air sampling filters. Occupational asthma caused by clam was confirmed by specific inhalation challenges in one subject in addition to the index case. These two subjects had skin reactivity and increased specific IgE antibodies to clam, shrimp, or both.
By including the initial subject, the prevalence of immediate sensitization is 5% to 7% to clam and 14% to 16% to shrimp. Two (4%) subjects had occupational asthma caused by clam, and one (2%) had occupational asthma caused by shrimp.
为确诊一名食品公司工人因蛤蜊和虾引发的职业性哮喘,对另外60名暴露工人(56名参与者)进行了如下调查。
在蛤蜊和虾的生产期之前,开展了医疗和职业问卷调查,并使用常见吸入剂以及蛤蜊、虾、蟹和龙虾提取物进行皮肤和放射性变应原吸附试验(RAST)检测。在生产期期间,使用个人和常规采样器进行环境监测;对皮肤对蛤蜊、虾或两者即刻产生反应的受试者进行了乙酰甲胆碱吸入试验。生产期结束后,由一名专家对所有皮肤对蛤蜊、虾或两者即刻产生反应且有鼻结膜炎、哮喘或支气管高反应性病史的受试者进行了检查。
包括已确诊对蛤蜊和虾患职业性哮喘的首例病例在内,在蛤蜊生产期间,有4名(7%)受试者有鼻结膜炎病史,2名(4%)有哮喘病史;而在虾生产期间,有3名(5%)受试者有鼻结膜炎,2名(4%)有哮喘。3名(5%)受试者对蛤蜊皮肤即刻产生反应,9名(16%)受试者对虾皮肤即刻产生反应。4名(7%)受试者对蛤蜊的特异性IgE抗体增加(RAST结合率≥3%),8名(14%)受试者对虾的特异性IgE抗体增加。发现一方面对蛤蜊和虾的免疫反应性与另一方面对蟹和龙虾的免疫反应性之间存在显著关联。环境监测在空气采样滤器上发现了蛤蜊和虾。除首例病例外,一名受试者通过特异性吸入激发试验确诊了由蛤蜊引起的职业性哮喘。这两名受试者对蛤蜊、虾或两者有皮肤反应且特异性IgE抗体增加。
包括首例受试者在内,对蛤蜊即刻致敏的患病率为5%至7%,对虾即刻致敏的患病率为14%至16%。两名(4%)受试者患有由蛤蜊引起的职业性哮喘,一名(2%)受试者患有由虾引起的职业性哮喘。