• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解患者:个性化干预的过程模型。

Knowing the patient: a process model for individualized interventions.

作者信息

Radwin L E

机构信息

Department of Nursing, College of Health Professions, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 1995 Nov-Dec;44(6):364-70.

PMID:7501491
Abstract

A grounded theory method was used to study nurses' clinical decision making. Field notes, in-depth interviews, and documents were analyzed. The beginning process model contained the core concept, knowing the patient, a purposeful action whereby the nurse uses understanding of the patient's experiences, behaviors, feelings, and/or perceptions to select individualized interventions. Familiarity and intimacy were the properties of the core process; the patient-nurse interaction was the context. Three conditions included time, the nurse's experience, and other nurses' input. Four strategies facilitated the core process: empathizing, matching a pattern, developing a bigger picture, and balancing preferences with difficulties. Different strategies were used, as time and familiarity with the patient varied.

摘要

采用扎根理论方法研究护士的临床决策。对实地记录、深入访谈和文档进行了分析。初始过程模型包含核心概念“了解患者”,这是一种有目的的行为,护士借此利用对患者经历、行为、感受和/或认知的理解来选择个性化干预措施。熟悉度和亲密感是核心过程的属性;护患互动是背景。三个条件包括时间、护士的经验以及其他护士的意见。四种策略促进了核心过程:共情、匹配模式、形成整体认识以及在偏好与困难之间取得平衡。随着时间以及与患者熟悉程度的变化,会采用不同的策略。

相似文献

1
Knowing the patient: a process model for individualized interventions.了解患者:个性化干预的过程模型。
Nurs Res. 1995 Nov-Dec;44(6):364-70.
2
How do children's nurses make clinical decisions? Two preliminary studies.儿童护士如何做出临床决策?两项初步研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct;15(10):1324-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01453.x.
3
Iranian nurses' preparation for loss: finding a balance in end-of-life care.伊朗护士对死亡的准备:在临终关怀中寻求平衡。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Aug;18(16):2329-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02437.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
4
An interpretive phenomenological method for illuminating the meaning of caring relationship.一种用于阐明关怀关系意义的解释现象学方法。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Mar;20(1):42-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00378.x.
5
A review of clinical decision making: models and current research.临床决策综述:模型与当前研究
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jan;17(2):187-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01791.x. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
6
Nurses' reasoning process during care planning taking pressure ulcer prevention as an example. A think-aloud study.以预防压疮为例探讨护士在护理计划制定过程中的推理过程。一项有声思维研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.016. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
7
Consenting to DNR: critical care nurses' interactions with patients and family members.同意放弃心肺复苏术:重症监护护士与患者及家属的互动
Am J Crit Care. 1993 Jul;2(4):302-9.
8
Haemodynamic instability after cardiac surgery: nurses' perceptions of clinical decision-making.心脏手术后的血流动力学不稳定:护士对临床决策的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Sep;15(9):1081-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01392.x.
9
Application of a model of social information processing to nursing theory: how nurses respond to patients.社会信息处理模型在护理理论中的应用:护士如何应对患者。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Nov;64(4):388-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04795.x. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
10
Involvement of nurses in caring for patients requesting euthanasia in Flanders (Belgium): a qualitative study.比利时弗拉芒地区护士参与照顾请求安乐死患者的情况:一项定性研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Jul;43(5):589-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported care domains that enhance the experience of "being known" in an ambulatory cancer care centre.患者报告的护理领域,这些领域提升了门诊癌症护理中心“被了解”的体验。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2018 Jul 1;28(3):166-171. doi: 10.5737/23688076283166171. eCollection 2018 Summer.
2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2018 Jul 1;28(3):172-177. doi: 10.5737/23688076283172177. eCollection 2018 Summer.
3
The impact of nursing home residents' characteristics on ratings of importance of autonomy preferences in daily care over time.
随着时间推移,养老院居民特征对日常护理中自主偏好重要性评级的影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Aug;24(8):1334-1341. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1584875. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
4
The Change in Nursing Home Residents' Preferences Over Time.养老院居民偏好随时间的变化。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Dec;19(12):1092-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
5
The Hidden Lives of Nurses' Cognitive Artifacts.护士认知产物的隐秘生活。
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Sep 7;7(3):832-49. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-01-RA-0007.
6
Information needed to support knowing the patient.了解患者所需的信息。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2013 Oct-Dec;36(4):351-63. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000006.
7
Passing through a rocky way to reach the pick of clinical competency: A grounded theory study on nursing students' clinical learning.历经坎坷之路,方能达到临床能力的巅峰:一项关于护生临床学习的扎根理论研究
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012 Jul;17(5):330-7.
8
Preventing pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury: targeting risky life circumstances through community-based interventions.预防脊髓损伤患者的压疮:通过基于社区的干预措施针对高风险生活环境。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011 Jun;24(6):275-84; quiz 285-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000398663.66530.46.
9
An update on the representational approach to patient education.患者教育代表性方法的最新情况。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(3):259-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00178.x.