Hémon D
INSERM Unité 170, Recherches Epidémiologiques et Statistiques sur l'Environnement et la Santé, Villejuif.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1995;43(5):395-411.
Research in environmental epidemiology deals with physical, chemical and biological agents whose presence--or relative absence--within the different media coming into contract with human beings (air, water, soil, food, etc...) may be harmful to human health. Some "major" environmental risk factors are well known. In a number of situations, however, environment-disease associations are "weak". This does not rule out the possibility that the exposures involved have a significant impact on human health, considering their prevalence which is frequently high. However, this complicates their study owing to the potential importance of biases as well as that of sampling fluctuations. Although increasing study size is of crucial importance, it is not sufficient to establish a clearcut distinction between "weak" associations and "diluted" ones. To improve our knowledge of health risks which are associated with environmental exposures, the basic methodological principles of epidemiological research--to define and adequately measure exposures, health outcomes, confounders and effect modifiers--may be very valuable to approach the study of "weak" associations: 1) identifying and quantifying the presence of the agents of interest in the environment, studying the distribution of environmental exposures among individuals and its determinants, taking into account the whole history of personal exposures and integrating adequately the short term time variability of exposures, giving special attention to the type and intensity of exposures may help in the definition and measurement of exposures; 2) carefully analyzing the interactions which may exist between the physical, chemical and biological agents of interest and the human body may greatly help in the elaboration, measurement and validation of relevant health outcomes (exposures to the target organs, early lesions and health impairments); 3) this same approach may also greatly contribute to the identification of constitutional or acquired individual characteristics which may interact with environmental agents in the development of diseases. While there is no guarantee that such approaches will successfully discriminate between "weak" and "diluted" associations, it is likely that inconclusive epidemiological evidence will be very difficult to avoid if such approaches are neglected by environmental epidemiologists.
环境流行病学的研究涉及物理、化学和生物制剂,这些制剂在与人类接触的不同介质(空气、水、土壤、食物等)中的存在或相对缺乏可能对人类健康有害。一些“主要”的环境风险因素是众所周知的。然而,在许多情况下,环境与疾病的关联是“微弱的”。考虑到这些暴露因素的高流行率,这并不排除所涉及的暴露对人类健康有重大影响的可能性。然而,由于偏差以及抽样波动的潜在重要性,这使得它们的研究变得复杂。虽然增加研究规模至关重要,但这不足以明确区分“微弱”关联和“稀释”关联。为了提高我们对与环境暴露相关的健康风险的认识,流行病学研究的基本方法原则——定义和充分测量暴露、健康结果、混杂因素和效应修饰因素——对于研究“微弱”关联可能非常有价值:1)识别和量化环境中感兴趣的制剂的存在,研究个体之间环境暴露的分布及其决定因素,考虑个人暴露的整个历史并充分整合暴露的短期时间变异性,特别关注暴露的类型和强度,这可能有助于暴露的定义和测量;2)仔细分析感兴趣的物理、化学和生物制剂与人体之间可能存在的相互作用,这可能极大地有助于相关健康结果(对靶器官的暴露、早期病变和健康损害)的阐述、测量和验证;3)同样的方法也可能极大地有助于识别可能在疾病发展过程中与环境制剂相互作用的个体体质或后天特征。虽然不能保证这些方法能成功区分“微弱”和“稀释”关联,但如果环境流行病学家忽视这些方法,很可能很难避免得出不确定的流行病学证据。