Grandjean P
Institute of Community Health, Odense University, Denmark.
Public Health Rev. 1993;21(3-4):255-62.
Environmental epidemiology faces major obstacles that are well known in epidemiology in general, though often particularly troublesome in studies of environmental hazards. Major problems include misclassification due to imprecise determination of environmental exposures or poor discrimination of nonspecific effects. New insight into reserve capacities of organ function suggest that better markers of early toxicity could be used in environmental epidemiology along with biological markers of exposure. Also, individual susceptibility, whether genetic or not, needs to be explored as a definite source of variable sensitivity to environmental hazards. Epidemiology is of key importance in identifying environmental hazards and in determining the magnitude of risk. However, environmental epidemiology faces problems that are familiar from the general field of epidemiology, but some of these difficulties are of special concern in studies of environmental hazards. Thus, due to the limited span of the exposure interval, misclassification may occur to a considerable degree. The effects are often nonspecific, and attempts are therefore made to identify early markers of adverse effects. The general population consists of individuals with different degrees of susceptibility to toxicity, and this variation can be a source of confounding bias. Thus, a major objective is to increase the power of environmental epidemiology studies.
环境流行病学面临着一些在整个流行病学领域中都广为人知的重大障碍,不过在环境危害研究中这些障碍往往特别棘手。主要问题包括因环境暴露的测定不准确或对非特异性效应的区分能力差而导致的错误分类。对器官功能储备能力的新认识表明,在环境流行病学中,可以将更好的早期毒性标志物与暴露生物标志物一起使用。此外,个体易感性,无论是否为遗传因素,都需要作为对环境危害敏感性差异的一个明确来源加以探究。流行病学在识别环境危害和确定风险程度方面至关重要。然而,环境流行病学面临着一些在流行病学一般领域中常见的问题,但其中一些困难在环境危害研究中尤为值得关注。因此,由于暴露间隔时间有限,可能会出现相当程度的错误分类。这些效应往往是非特异性的,因此人们试图识别不良反应的早期标志物。一般人群由对毒性有不同易感性的个体组成,这种差异可能是混杂偏倚的一个来源。因此,一个主要目标是提高环境流行病学研究的效能。