Nakagiri I, Ichihara K, Ohmoto K, Hirokawa M, Matsuda N
Department of Clinical Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):2974-80. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.2974-2980.1993.
The diagnostic performances of five commercially available second-generation assays for anti-hepatitis C virus antibody, two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, one enzyme immunoassay, and two particle agglutination assays (passive hemagglutination assay and particle agglutination assay), were evaluated. Among 104 samples from healthy subjects and 300 consecutive samples from patient ordered for routine determinations of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody in serum, assay results showed variable degrees of discordance for 17 samples (4.2%). These 17 samples were further tested by an immunoblot assay, the polymerase chain reaction-RNA assay, and the hemagglutination inhibition assay. Four of the 17 samples were regarded as true positive, since all supplementary assays and clinical data indicated active hepatitis C virus infection. Another five samples were considered false positive because no confirmatory evidence was obtained from the laboratory analysis or clinical data. The remaining eight samples were negative for hepatitis C virus RNA, but the results of the other supplementary tests were indeterminate. Some of these samples with indeterminate results may have been from patients with subclinical cases of disease who spontaneously recovered from hepatitis with persistent anti-hepatitis C virus antibody in their sera.
评估了五种市售第二代抗丙型肝炎病毒抗体检测方法、两种酶联免疫吸附测定法、一种酶免疫测定法以及两种颗粒凝集测定法(被动血凝测定法和颗粒凝集测定法)的诊断性能。在104份健康受试者样本和300份连续的、因血清抗丙型肝炎病毒抗体常规检测而送检的患者样本中,检测结果显示17份样本(4.2%)存在不同程度的不一致。对这17份样本进一步采用免疫印迹法、聚合酶链反应 - RNA检测法和血凝抑制检测法进行检测。17份样本中有4份被视为真阳性,因为所有补充检测和临床数据均表明存在丙型肝炎病毒活动性感染。另外5份样本被认为是假阳性,因为实验室分析或临床数据未获得确证依据。其余8份样本丙型肝炎病毒RNA检测为阴性,但其他补充检测结果不确定。这些结果不确定的样本中,有些可能来自亚临床疾病患者,他们从肝炎中自发康复,但血清中仍存在持续的抗丙型肝炎病毒抗体。