• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏直视手术患者中10% 羟乙基淀粉与5% 白蛋白的比较。

A comparison of 10% pentastarch and 5% albumin in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.

作者信息

Mastroianni L, Low H B, Rollman J, Wagle M, Bleske B, Chow M S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Hartford Hospital, CT 06115.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Jan;34(1):34-40. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1994.tb03963.x.

DOI:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1994.tb03963.x
PMID:7510728
Abstract

Colloids are useful in cardiac surgery to increase preload and improve cardiac output without the risks associated with blood transfusions. Pentastarch is a new low-molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch compound under investigation for this purpose. The authors compared, in a randomized fashion, 12 patients who received pentastarch and 17 patients who received albumin for volume expansion after open-heart surgery. During the 24-hour study period there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to systemic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, right atrial pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, with the exception of a higher mean arterial pressure and systolic blood pressure at 4 hours in the albumin group and higher heart rate at 12 hours in the pentastarch group. In addition, postoperative prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, platelets, and factor VIII levels were not significantly different between the two groups. There were no complications attributed to colloid administration. The hemodynamic parameters were further evaluated in a subset of 6 pentastarch and 9 albumin patients who received the first 500 mL of colloid in a similar time frame and under similar clinical conditions. The patients who received pentastarch showed a significantly greater increase in cardiac index than did the patients who received albumin. No significant change in other parameters were noted between the two groups. The authors conclude that pentastarch is as safe as albumin and may be a more effective volume expander than albumin when used in open-heart surgery patients.

摘要

胶体在心脏手术中有助于增加前负荷并改善心输出量,且无输血相关风险。喷他淀粉是一种新型低分子量羟乙基淀粉化合物,正为此目的进行研究。作者以随机方式比较了12例接受喷他淀粉的患者和17例接受白蛋白用于心脏直视手术后扩容的患者。在24小时研究期间,两组在全身血压、平均动脉压、心脏指数、右心房压和肺毛细血管楔压方面无显著差异,但白蛋白组在4小时时平均动脉压和收缩压较高,喷他淀粉组在12小时时心率较高。此外,两组术后凝血酶原时间、部分凝血活酶时间、纤维蛋白原、血小板和因子VIII水平无显著差异。未出现归因于胶体给药的并发症。在6例接受喷他淀粉和9例接受白蛋白的患者亚组中,在相似时间框架和相似临床条件下给予首剂500 mL胶体后,对血流动力学参数进行了进一步评估。接受喷他淀粉的患者心脏指数的增加显著大于接受白蛋白的患者。两组间其他参数未发现显著变化。作者得出结论,喷他淀粉与白蛋白一样安全,在心脏直视手术患者中使用时可能是比白蛋白更有效的扩容剂。

相似文献

1
A comparison of 10% pentastarch and 5% albumin in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.心脏直视手术患者中10% 羟乙基淀粉与5% 白蛋白的比较。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Jan;34(1):34-40. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1994.tb03963.x.
2
A randomized clinical trial of 10% pentastarch (low molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch) versus 5% albumin for plasma volume expansion after cardiac operations.一项关于10% 喷他淀粉(低分子量羟乙基淀粉)与5% 白蛋白用于心脏手术后血浆容量扩充的随机临床试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 May;97(5):785-97.
3
Pentastarch versus albumin in cardiopulmonary bypass prime: impact on blood loss.体外循环预充液中万汶与白蛋白对比:对失血的影响
J Card Surg. 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):279-86; discussion 287. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1999.tb00994.x.
4
Hemodynamic and oxygen transport effects of pentastarch in burn resuscitation.羟乙基淀粉在烧伤复苏中的血流动力学及氧输送效应
Ann Surg. 1989 Mar;209(3):341-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198903000-00015.
5
Hypertonic-hyperoncotic solutions improve cardiac function in children after open-heart surgery.高渗高渗胶体溶液可改善儿童心脏直视手术后的心脏功能。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e76-84. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2795. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
6
Effects of pentastarch and albumin infusion on cardiorespiratory function and coagulation in patients with severe sepsis and systemic hypoperfusion.羟乙基淀粉和白蛋白输注对严重脓毒症和全身低灌注患者心肺功能及凝血的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1989 May;17(5):394-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198905000-00003.
7
Hydroxyethyl starch versus albumin for colloid infusion following cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization.在接受心肌血运重建的患者体外循环后,羟乙基淀粉与白蛋白用于胶体输注的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1984 Jan;37(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60707-2.
8
Hemodynamic comparison of albumin and hydroxyethyl starch in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.白蛋白与羟乙基淀粉用于心脏手术后患者的血流动力学比较
Crit Care Med. 1983 Dec;11(12):943-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198312000-00009.
9
Comparison of hetastarch with albumin for postoperative volume expansion in children after cardiopulmonary bypass.在体外循环后的儿童中,羟乙基淀粉与白蛋白用于术后容量扩充的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996 Apr;10(3):348-51. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(96)80095-4.
10
The safety and efficacy of ten percent pentastarch as a cardiopulmonary bypass priming solution. A randomized clinical trial.10% 万汶作为体外循环预充液的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 Aug;104(2):284-96.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of hydroxyethyl starches in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis.羟乙基淀粉在心脏手术中的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2014 Dec 4;18(6):656. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0656-0.
2
Guidelines for the clinical use of albumin: comparison of use in two Italian hospitals and a third hospital without guidelines.白蛋白临床使用指南:两家意大利医院与一家无指南的第三家医院的使用情况比较
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003 Nov;64(9):676-84. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2003.11.002.
3
Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation.用于液体复苏的胶体溶液。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD001319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001319.pub5.
4
Hydroxyethyl starch for cardiovascular surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.羟乙基淀粉用于心血管手术:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;67(8):767-82. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1008-5. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
5
Cardiac response is greater for colloid than saline fluid loading after cardiac or vascular surgery.心脏或血管手术后,胶体补液比生理盐水补液引起的心脏反应更大。
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jul;32(7):1030-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0195-5. Epub 2006 May 23.