• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of immediate release and controlled release hydromorphone for chronic severe cancer pain.

作者信息

Hays H, Hagen N, Thirlwell M, Dhaliwal H, Babul N, Harsanyi Z, Darke A C

机构信息

Palliative Care Service, Misericordia Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Cancer. 1994 Sep 15;74(6):1808-16. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1808::aid-cncr2820740625>3.0.co;2-y.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1808::aid-cncr2820740625>3.0.co;2-y
PMID:7521784
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The short elimination half-life of hydromorphone necessitates 4-hourly dosing to maintain optimal levels of analgesia in patients with chronic cancer pain. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of controlled release hydromorphone administered every 12 hours and immediate release hydromorphone administered every 4 hours in patients with chronic severe cancer pain.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with stable chronic severe cancer pain were randomized, in a double-masked crossover study, to controlled release hydromorphone every 12 hours or immediate release hydromorphone every 4 hours for 7 days each. Pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Present Pain Intensity Index of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Nausea and sedation were also assessed using a VAS. Assessments were made by the patient four times a day at 7:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m., and 7:00 p.m. Use of rescue hydromorphone also was recorded by the patient.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients completed the study (26 women, 19 men; mean age, 57.1 +/- 13.6 years) and received a mean daily dose of 76 +/- 133 mg (range, 6-768 mg). There were no significant differences between controlled release hydromorphone and immediate release hydromorphone in overall VAS pain intensity scores (19 +/- 14 vs. 20 +/- 14 mm), ordinal pain intensity scores (1.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.8) and pain scores by day of treatment or time of day. The daily rescue analgesic consumption during controlled release hydromorphone and immediate release hydromorphone did not differ significantly overall (1.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.0 +/- 1.1 doses per day) or with respect to time of day. There were no significant differences in overall VAS sedation scores (18 +/- 18 mm vs. 19 +/- 18 mm) and in overall mean VAS nausea scores (12 +/- 15 mm vs. 11 +/- 14 mm) between controlled release hydromorphone and immediate release hydromorphone.

CONCLUSIONS

Controlled release hydromorphone administered every 12 hours is as effective as immediate release hydromorphone administered every 4 hours in the management of patients with chronic severe cancer pain. The benefits of controlled release hydromorphone lie in the convenience of its capsule formulation, which can be sprinkled on soft food, and its 12-hour duration of action, which allows patients uninterrupted sleep and improved compliance.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of immediate release and controlled release hydromorphone for chronic severe cancer pain.
Cancer. 1994 Sep 15;74(6):1808-16. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1808::aid-cncr2820740625>3.0.co;2-y.
2
Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of a novel controlled-release oxycodone formulation and controlled-release hydromorphone in the treatment of cancer pain.新型控释羟考酮制剂与控释氢吗啡酮治疗癌痛的临床疗效与安全性比较
Cancer. 1997 Apr 1;79(7):1428-37.
3
Multicenter, open-label, prospective evaluation of the conversion from previous opioid analgesics to extended-release hydromorphone hydrochloride administered every 24 hours to patients with persistent moderate to severe pain.多中心、开放标签、前瞻性评估:将既往使用阿片类镇痛药的持续性中度至重度疼痛患者转换为每24小时服用一次盐酸氢吗啡酮缓释剂的情况。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jan;28(1):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.010.
4
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial comparing the safety and efficacy of oral sustained-release hydromorphone with immediate-release hydromorphone in patients with cancer pain. Canadian Palliative Care Clinical Trials Group.一项随机、双盲、双模拟、交叉试验,比较口服缓释氢吗啡酮与即释氢吗啡酮在癌症疼痛患者中的安全性和有效性。加拿大姑息治疗临床试验组。
J Clin Oncol. 1996 May;14(5):1713-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.5.1713.
5
A randomized, double-blind, 8-week crossover study of once-daily controlled-release tramadol versus immediate-release tramadol taken as needed for chronic noncancer pain.一项针对慢性非癌性疼痛的随机、双盲、为期8周的交叉研究,比较每日一次的控释曲马多与按需服用的即释曲马多。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.001.
6
Clinical efficacy and safety of a novel controlled-release morphine suppository and subcutaneous morphine in cancer pain: a randomized evaluation.新型控释吗啡栓剂与皮下注射吗啡治疗癌痛的临床疗效与安全性:一项随机评估
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jun;13(6):1520-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.6.1520.
7
Efficacy of a new once daily hydromorphone formulation in comparison with twice daily administration in chronic pain: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 May;32(5):869-77. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1149052. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
8
Comparative efficacy of oral extended-release hydromorphone and immediate-release hydromorphone in patients with persistent moderate to severe pain: two randomized controlled trials.口服缓释氢吗啡酮与即释氢吗啡酮治疗持续性中重度疼痛患者的疗效比较:两项随机对照试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Jun;29(6):584-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.10.008.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily OROS hydromorphone and twice-daily extended-release oxycodone in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain: results of a 6-week, randomized, open-label, noninferiority analysis.每日一次的奥施康定(OROS 氢吗啡酮)与每日两次的缓释羟考酮治疗慢性中重度骨关节炎疼痛患者的疗效和耐受性:一项为期 6 周的随机、开放标签、非劣效性分析结果
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):874-888. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.016.
10
Randomized evaluation of controlled-release codeine and placebo in chronic cancer pain.缓释可待因与安慰剂治疗慢性癌痛的随机评估
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995 Nov;10(8):612-23. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(95)00123-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of hydromorphone for cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氢吗啡酮治疗癌痛的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02638-y.
2
Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in women with provoked vestibulodynia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗女性诱发性前庭性疼痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 May 14;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1366-5.
3
Effectiveness and gastrointestinal tolerability during conversion and titration with once-daily OROS® hydromorphone extended release in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic low back pain.
每日一次 OROS®氢吗啡酮缓释片在慢性腰痛的阿片类药物耐受患者中转换和滴定过程中的疗效和胃肠道耐受性。
J Pain Res. 2013 May 1;6:319-29. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S39980. Print 2013.
4
A new extended release formulation (OROS) of hydromorphone in the management of pain.一种新的氢吗啡酮控释剂型(OROS)在疼痛管理中的应用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009 Feb;5(1):75-80. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s1124. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
5
Review of oral oxymorphone in the management of pain.口服羟吗啡酮治疗疼痛的综述。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Aug;4(4):777-87. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s1784.
6
The impact of medication regimen factors on adherence to chronic treatment: a review of literature.药物治疗方案因素对慢性治疗依从性的影响:文献综述
J Behav Med. 2008 Jun;31(3):213-24. doi: 10.1007/s10865-007-9147-y. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
7
Less nausea, emesis, and constipation comparing hydromorphone and morphine? A prospective open-labeled investigation on cancer pain.与吗啡相比,氢吗啡酮引起的恶心、呕吐和便秘更少?一项关于癌症疼痛的前瞻性开放标签研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Sep;16(9):999-1009. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0368-y. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
8
Controlled clinical trials in cancer pain. How controlled should they be? A qualitative systematic review.癌症疼痛的对照临床试验。它们应该如何进行对照?一项定性系统评价。
Br J Cancer. 2006 Jun 5;94(11):1559-67. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603162.
9
Pharmacoeconomics of chronic nonmalignant pain.慢性非恶性疼痛的药物经济学
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Oct;10(4):356-77. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610040-00005.
10
Opioid analgesics: comparative features and prescribing guidelines.阿片类镇痛药:比较特征与处方指南
Drugs. 1996 May;51(5):713-37. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651050-00002.