Xu J, Rockow S, Kim S, Xiong W, Li W
Ben May Institute, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;14(12):8018-27. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.12.8018-8027.1994.
Interferons (IFNs) exert antiproliferative effects on many types of cells. The underlying molecular mechanism, however, is unclear. One possibility is that IFNs block growth factor-induced mitogenic signaling, which involves activation of Ras/Raf-1/MEK/mitogen-activated protein kinase. We have tested this hypothesis by using HER14 cells (NIH 3T3 cell expressing both platelet-derived growth factor [PDGF] and epidermal growth factor [EGF] receptors) as a model system. Our studies showed that IFNs (alpha/beta and gamma) blocked PDGF-and phorbol ester- but not EGF-stimulated DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. While the ligand-stimulated receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and interaction with downstream signaling molecules, such as GRB2, were not affected, IFNs specifically blocked PDGF- and phorbol ester- but not EGF-stimulated activation of Raf-1, mitogen-activated protein kinases, and tyrosine phosphorylation of an unidentified 34-kDa protein. This inhibition could be detected as early as 5 min after IFN treatments and was insensitive to cycloheximide, indicating that de novo protein synthesis is not required. The IFN-induced inhibition acted upstream of Raf-1 kinase and downstream of diacyl glycerol/phorbol ester, suggesting that protein kinase C (PKC) is the potential primary target. Consistently, downregulation of PKC by chronic phorbol myristate acetate treatment or inhibition of PKC by H7 and staurosporine blocked PDGF- and phorbol myristate acetate- but not EGF-induced signaling and DNA synthesis. Moreover, incubating cells with antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotides of PKC delta eliminated production of PKC delta protein and specifically blocked PDGF- but not EGF-stimulated mitogenesis in these cells. Thus, these studies have elucidated a major difference in the early events of EGF-and PDGF-stimulated signal transduction and, more importantly, revealed a novel mechanism by which IFNs may execute their antiproliferative function.
干扰素(IFNs)对多种细胞发挥抗增殖作用。然而,其潜在的分子机制尚不清楚。一种可能性是,干扰素阻断生长因子诱导的促有丝分裂信号传导,这涉及Ras/Raf-1/MEK/丝裂原活化蛋白激酶的激活。我们通过使用HER14细胞(表达血小板衍生生长因子[PDGF]和表皮生长因子[EGF]受体的NIH 3T3细胞)作为模型系统来验证这一假设。我们的研究表明,干扰素(α/β和γ)阻断PDGF和佛波酯刺激的DNA合成及细胞增殖,但不阻断EGF刺激的DNA合成及细胞增殖。虽然配体刺激的受体酪氨酸磷酸化以及与下游信号分子(如GRB2)的相互作用未受影响,但干扰素特异性地阻断PDGF和佛波酯刺激的Raf-1、丝裂原活化蛋白激酶的激活以及一种未鉴定的34 kDa蛋白的酪氨酸磷酸化。这种抑制在干扰素处理后5分钟即可检测到,并且对放线菌酮不敏感,这表明不需要从头合成蛋白质。干扰素诱导的抑制作用在Raf-1激酶的上游和二酰基甘油/佛波酯的下游起作用,这表明蛋白激酶C(PKC)是潜在的主要靶点。一致的是,通过长期佛波醇肉豆蔻酸酯乙酸盐处理下调PKC或用H7和星形孢菌素抑制PKC,可阻断PDGF和佛波醇肉豆蔻酸酯乙酸盐刺激的信号传导及DNA合成,但不阻断EGF诱导的信号传导及DNA合成。此外,用PKCδ的反义寡脱氧核苷酸孵育细胞可消除PKCδ蛋白的产生,并特异性地阻断这些细胞中PDGF刺激的有丝分裂,但不阻断EGF刺激的有丝分裂。因此,这些研究阐明了EGF和PDGF刺激的信号转导早期事件的主要差异,更重要的是,揭示了干扰素可能执行其抗增殖功能的新机制。