Avilés A, Soto B, Guzmán R, García E L, Nambo M J, Díaz-Maqueo J C
Department of Hematology, Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico.
Med Pediatr Oncol. 1995 Mar;24(3):171-5. doi: 10.1002/mpo.2950240306.
From January 1986 to December 1989, 157 previously untreated patients, with Hodgkin's disease stage I or II without bulky disease, were enrolled in a clinical comparative study. The objectives of the study were to compare the efficacy and safety of using epirubicine or mitoxantrone instead of adriamycin in the combination chemotherapy regimen ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine). The complete response rate was better in the patients treated with the ABVD or EBVD regimens compared to the MBVD arm. Also, differences in overall survival and relapse-free survival were better in the patients who received ABVD or EBVD compared to the MBVD regimen. Hematological, gastrointestinal and cardiac toxicity were similar in the three groups. Dose intensity, delays and complications were also similar in the three groups. The mitoxantrone-containing regimen was found to have less efficacy in comparison to the other regimens tested in the present study in patients with favorable stage I or II Hodgkin's disease.
1986年1月至1989年12月,157例既往未接受过治疗、患有I期或II期霍奇金病且无大块病灶的患者被纳入一项临床对照研究。该研究的目的是比较在联合化疗方案ABVD(阿霉素、博来霉素、长春花碱和达卡巴嗪)中使用表柔比星或米托蒽醌替代阿霉素的疗效和安全性。与MBVD组相比,接受ABVD或EBVD方案治疗的患者完全缓解率更高。此外,与MBVD方案相比,接受ABVD或EBVD治疗的患者总生存期和无复发生存期的差异也更好。三组的血液学、胃肠道和心脏毒性相似。三组的剂量强度、延迟和并发症也相似。在本研究中,对于I期或II期预后良好的霍奇金病患者,含米托蒽醌的方案与其他测试方案相比疗效较差。