Suppr超能文献

[人丙种球蛋白在普通可变免疫缺陷治疗中的应用]

[The use of human gamma globulin in the treatment of common variable immunodeficiency].

作者信息

de Gracia J, Vendrell M, Guarner L, Vidal R, Miravitlles M, Mayordomo C, Morell F

机构信息

Servicio de Neumología, Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 1995 Feb 18;104(6):201-6.

PMID:7534366
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The indication for treatment with human gammaglobulin in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia is well established. Nonetheless, there are no uniform criteria with regard to dose, periodicity and route of administration.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVI) who received i.m. or i.v. treatment with gammaglobulin were studied, evaluating the secondary effects, stable levels of IgG achieved, control of symptomatology, clinical evolution and the need for adjuvant therapies.

RESULTS

Intravenous administration was more effective than intramuscular administration to achieve higher total IgG serum levels (5.2 +/- 1.2 vs 3.5 +/- 1.6 g/l; p = 0.07) in a shorter period of time (2.1 +/- 1.6 months vs 6.3 +/- 2.8 months; p < 0.01) and with new few secondary effects. The dose and periodicity of the treatment was individualized in each patient on the basis of the needs of consumption and the speed of metabolism of the gammaglobulin, with patients with chronic bronchial suppuration and diarrhea being those requiring the greatest doses (p < 0.0001) and a short interdosis time interval (19.2 +/- 3.1 vs 23.6 +/- 3.6 days; p = 0.01). Treatment with human gammaglobulin allowed the control of recurrent bacterial infection; however, adjuvant treatment with respiratory physical measures and antibiotics were required in patients with chronic bronchial suppuration to avoid progressive alteration of respiratory function.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of human gammaglobulin at adequate doses and frequency is effective to control infection, avoid the development of chronic bronchial disease, alteration of pulmonary function and the appearance of other complications. Intravenous route is safer and produces fewer secondary effects than intramuscular administration with the doses and period of the treatment requiring individualization for each patient.

摘要

背景

原发性低丙种球蛋白血症患者使用人丙种球蛋白治疗的指征已明确确立。然而,在剂量、给药周期和给药途径方面尚无统一标准。

方法

对27例接受肌内或静脉注射丙种球蛋白治疗的常见可变免疫缺陷(CVI)患者进行研究,评估其副作用、达到的稳定IgG水平、症状控制情况、临床进展以及辅助治疗的必要性。

结果

静脉给药在更短时间内(2.1±1.6个月对6.3±2.8个月;p<0.01)达到更高的总IgG血清水平(5.2±1.2对3.5±1.6g/l;p = 0.07)且副作用更少,比肌内给药更有效。根据丙种球蛋白的消耗需求和代谢速度对每位患者的治疗剂量和周期进行个体化调整,慢性支气管化脓和腹泻患者需要最大剂量(p<0.0001)且给药间隔时间短(19.2±3.1对23.6±3.6天;p = 0.01)。人丙种球蛋白治疗可控制复发性细菌感染;然而,慢性支气管化脓患者需要呼吸物理措施和抗生素辅助治疗以避免呼吸功能的进行性改变。

结论

以适当剂量和频率给予人丙种球蛋白可有效控制感染,避免慢性支气管疾病的发展、肺功能改变及其他并发症的出现。静脉途径比肌内给药更安全,副作用更少,且治疗剂量和周期需要对每位患者进行个体化调整。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验