Suppr超能文献

两种不同形式膳食纤维(米糠与麦麸)对大鼠结肠黏膜和粪便微生物群影响的比较评价。

Comparative evaluation of the effects of two different forms of dietary fibre (rice bran vs. wheat bran) on rat colonic mucosa and faecal microflora.

作者信息

Gestel G, Besançon P, Rouanet J M

机构信息

Unité de Nutrition, Université Montpellier-II, France.

出版信息

Ann Nutr Metab. 1994;38(5):249-56. doi: 10.1159/000177818.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the physiological consequences of two dietary fibre sources on the faecal microflora and colonic mucosal growth in rats. The studied sources, a moderately well-soluble fibre (rice bran, RB) and a less well-soluble fibre (wheat bran, WB), were included in diets of rats at a level of 10% for 3 weeks and compared with a totally fibre-deprived diet. RB significantly increased faecal water compared to the control diet (p < 0.05). Faecal nitrogen content and bacterial mass, as estimated from the 2,6-diaminopimelic acid (DAPA) output, were greatly and significantly increased by RB, and to a lesser extent by WB, compared to the control diet. Total bile acid excretion was significantly higher by rats fed RB than by those fed WB. Faecal bacterial enzyme activities tested (beta-glucuronidase, mucinase and nitroreductase) were significantly reduced by the two different fibre sources, but RB was more effective than WB, except for nitroreductase activity which was reduced at the same level for each fibre source. Although measurements of mucosal colonic weight and RNA content were significantly different between groups fed RB and WB (p < 0.05), DNA content and the ratio RNA/DNA did not significantly differ between these groups. Our results indicate that the differential changes observed in beta-glucuronidase and mucinase activities and DAPA and bile acid excretion may depend on the nature of the fibre consumed. They also suggest that RB, which had similar effects, sometimes more marked than WB, on the studied parameters, may be a new valuable fibre source.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种膳食纤维来源对大鼠粪便微生物群和结肠黏膜生长的生理影响。所研究的膳食纤维来源,一种是中度可溶纤维(米糠,RB)和一种难溶纤维(麦麸,WB),以10%的水平添加到大鼠饮食中持续3周,并与完全不含纤维的饮食进行比较。与对照饮食相比,RB显著增加了粪便含水量(p<0.05)。与对照饮食相比,RB使粪便氮含量和细菌量(根据二氨基庚二酸(DAPA)产量估算)大幅且显著增加,WB的增加幅度较小。喂食RB的大鼠总胆汁酸排泄量显著高于喂食WB的大鼠。测试的粪便细菌酶活性(β-葡萄糖醛酸酶、粘蛋白酶和硝基还原酶)被两种不同的纤维来源显著降低,但RB比WB更有效,除了硝基还原酶活性在每种纤维来源下降低程度相同。尽管喂食RB和WB的组之间结肠黏膜重量和RNA含量的测量值存在显著差异(p<0.05),但这些组之间的DNA含量和RNA/DNA比值没有显著差异。我们的结果表明,观察到的β-葡萄糖醛酸酶和粘蛋白酶活性以及DAPA和胆汁酸排泄的差异变化可能取决于所摄入纤维的性质。结果还表明,RB对所研究参数具有类似的影响,有时比WB更显著,可能是一种新的有价值的纤维来源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验