Zwisler O, Ronneberger H
Dev Biol Stand. 1978;41:39-43.
Mongrel dogs were revaccinated three weeks after basic parenteral immunization with a DT-vaccine with 3 X 3 capsules of an enteric coated oral vaccine, which contained 500 Lf in each of the capsules. When there was a basic titer of 0.005 IU/ml serum, the titer went up to 10 IU/ml by oral vaccination. Similar levels were obtained when lozenges containing the same amount of toxoid were used for revaccination. A twofold buccal vaccination without preceding parenteral vaccination yielded no protective titers. Also a parenteral basic immunization with a diluted DPT-vaccine, followed by oral vaccination with enteric coated capsules, containing a soluble pertussis vaccine, resulted in no titers measured by bacterial agglutination test. In the cases of diphtheria and tetanus only part of the animals showed elevated titres after oral vaccination and protective titers could only be reached if rather high amounts of toxoids were administered orally. It can be concluded from the results that an oral revaccination does not confer protective immunity comparable to that conferred by parenteral vaccination.
杂种犬在通过胃肠外途径用含有3×3粒肠溶口服疫苗胶囊的白喉破伤风疫苗进行基础免疫三周后再次接种疫苗,每粒胶囊含500Lf。当血清基础滴度为0.005IU/ml时,通过口服疫苗接种,滴度升至10IU/ml。当使用含有相同量类毒素的含片进行再次接种时,也获得了类似的水平。在没有先前胃肠外接种的情况下进行两倍剂量的口腔接种未产生保护性滴度。同样,用稀释的百白破疫苗进行胃肠外基础免疫,随后用含有可溶性百日咳疫苗的肠溶胶囊进行口服接种,通过细菌凝集试验未检测到滴度。在白喉和破伤风病例中,只有部分动物在口服疫苗接种后滴度升高,只有口服相当大量的类毒素才能达到保护性滴度。从结果可以得出结论,口服再次接种不能赋予与胃肠外接种相当的保护性免疫。