Black M M, Dubowitz H, Hutcheson J, Berenson-Howard J, Starr R H
Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.
Pediatrics. 1995 Jun;95(6):807-14.
To evaluate the efficacy of a home-based intervention on the growth and development of children with nonorganic failure to thrive (NOFTT).
Randomized clinical trial.
The NOFTT sample included 130 children (mean age, 12.7 months; SD, 6.4) recruited from urban pediatric primary care clinics serving low income families. All children were younger than 25 months with weight for age below the fifth percentile. Eligibility criteria included gestational age of at least 36 weeks, birth weight appropriate for gestational age, and no significant history of perinatal complications, congenital disorders, chronic illnesses, or developmental disabilities. Children were randomized into two groups: clinic plus home intervention (HI) (n = 64) or clinic only (n = 66). There were no group differences in children's age, gender, race, or growth parameters, or on any of the family background variables. Most children were raised by single, African-American mothers who received public assistance. Eighty-nine percent of the families (116 of 130) completed the 1-year evaluation.
All children received services in a multidisciplinary growth and nutrition clinic. A community-based agency provided the home intervention. Families in the HI group were scheduled to receive weekly home visits for 1 year by lay home visitors, supervised by a community health nurse. The intervention provided maternal support and promoted parenting, child development, use of informal and formal resources, and parent advocacy.
Growth was measured by standard procedures and converted to z scores for weight for height and height for age to assess wasting and stunting. Cognitive and motor development were measured with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, and language development was measured by the Receptive/Expressive Emergent Language Scale. Both scales were administered at recruitment and at the 12-month follow-up. Parent-child interaction was measured by observing mothers and children during feeding at recruitment and at the 12-month follow-up, and the quality of the home was measured by the Home Observation Measure of the Environment 18 months after recruitment.
Repeated-measures multivariate analyses of covariance were used to examine changes in children's growth and development and parent-child interaction. Analyses of covariance were used to examine the quality of the home. Independent variables were intervention status and age at recruitment (1.0 to 12.0 vs 12.1 to 24.9 months). Maternal education was a covariate in all analyses. When changes in developmental status and parent-child interaction were examined, weight for height and height for age at recruitment were included as covariates.
Children's weight for age, weight for height, and height for age improved significantly during the 12-month study period, regardless of intervention status. Children in the HI group had better receptive language over time and more child-oriented home environments than children in the clinic-only group. The impact of intervention status on cognitive development varied as a function of children's ages at recruitment, with younger children showing beneficial effects of home intervention. There were no changes in motor development associated with intervention status. During the study period, children gained skills in interactive competence during feeding, and their parents became more controlling during feeding, but differences were not associated with intervention status.
Findings support a cautious optimism regarding home intervention during the first year of life provided by trained lay home visitors. Early home intervention can promote a nurturant home environment effectively and can reduce the developmental delays often experienced by low income, urban infants with NOFTT: Subsequent investigations of home intervention should consider alternative options for toddlers with NOFTT:
评估家庭干预对非器质性发育不良(NOFTT)儿童生长发育的效果。
随机临床试验。
NOFTT样本包括从为低收入家庭服务的城市儿科初级保健诊所招募的130名儿童(平均年龄12.7个月;标准差6.4)。所有儿童年龄均小于25个月,年龄别体重低于第五百分位数。入选标准包括胎龄至少36周、出生体重与胎龄相称,且无围产期并发症、先天性疾病、慢性疾病或发育障碍的显著病史。儿童被随机分为两组:诊所加家庭干预(HI)组(n = 64)和仅诊所治疗组(n = 66)。两组儿童在年龄、性别、种族、生长参数或任何家庭背景变量方面均无差异。大多数儿童由接受公共援助的单身非裔美国母亲抚养。89%的家庭(130个家庭中的116个)完成了1年的评估。
所有儿童均在多学科生长与营养诊所接受服务。一个社区机构提供家庭干预。HI组的家庭由非专业家访员安排接受为期1年的每周一次家访,由社区健康护士监督。该干预提供产妇支持,并促进育儿、儿童发育、非正式和正式资源的利用以及家长维权。
采用标准程序测量生长情况,并将其转换为身高别体重和年龄别身高的z评分,以评估消瘦和发育迟缓情况。认知和运动发育采用贝利婴儿发育量表进行测量,语言发育采用接受性/表达性新兴语言量表进行测量。这两个量表均在招募时和12个月随访时进行施测。亲子互动通过观察招募时和12个月随访时母亲和孩子在喂食过程中的表现来测量,家庭环境质量在招募18个月后采用家庭环境观察量表进行测量。
采用重复测量多元协方差分析来检验儿童生长发育和亲子互动的变化。采用协方差分析来检验家庭环境质量。自变量为干预状态和招募时的年龄(1.0至12.0个月与12.1至24.9个月)。母亲教育程度在所有分析中均作为协变量。在检验发育状态和亲子互动的变化时,招募时的身高别体重和年龄别身高作为协变量纳入分析。
在12个月的研究期间,无论干预状态如何,儿童的年龄别体重、身高别体重和年龄别身高均有显著改善。随着时间的推移,HI组儿童的接受性语言能力更好且家庭环境更以儿童为导向,优于仅诊所治疗组的儿童。干预状态对认知发育的影响因招募时儿童的年龄而异,年龄较小的儿童显示出家庭干预的有益效果。与干预状态无关的运动发育无变化。在研究期间,儿童在喂食过程中的互动能力有所提高,且他们的父母在喂食过程中变得更具掌控性,但差异与干预状态无关。
研究结果支持对受过训练的非专业家访员在生命第一年进行家庭干预持谨慎乐观态度。早期家庭干预可有效促进养育性家庭环境的形成,并可减少低收入城市NOFTT婴儿经常经历的发育迟缓:后续对家庭干预的研究应考虑针对NOFTT幼儿的替代方案。