Mannori G, Crottet P, Cecconi O, Hanasaki K, Aruffo A, Nelson R M, Varki A, Bevilacqua M P
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0669, USA.
Cancer Res. 1995 Oct 1;55(19):4425-31.
E-, P-, and L-selectin support the adhesion of leukocytes to the vessel wall through the recognition of specific carbohydrate ligands, which often contain sialylated, fucosylated lactosamines such as sialyl Lewis x [sLex; Neu5Ac alpha 2-3Gal beta 1-4(Fuc alpha 1-3)GlcNAc-]. E-selectin expressed by activated endothelium has been shown to support the adhesion of sLex-bearing colon cancer cells. In the present study, we examine the interactions of multiple colon cancer cell lines with all three selectins. Three colon cancer cell lines (LS 180, T84, and COLO 205) bound to recombinant purified E-, P-, and L-selectin. The colon cancer line COLO 320 bound to P- and L-selectin but not E-selectin; conversely, HT-29 cells bound E-selectin but not P- and L-selectin. Caco-2 showed little or no interaction with any of the three selectins. Treatment of the cells with O-sialoglycoprotease from Pasteurella haemolytica, an enzyme that selectively cleaves mucin-type O-linked glycoproteins, reduced binding to purified P- and L-selectin in all cases. In addition, recombinant soluble P- and L-selectin bound to affinity-purified mucins from all adherent tumor cell lines. Of the four tumor cell lines that interacted with E-selectin, O-glycoprotease treatment substantially diminished adhesion of LS 180 and T84, had little effect on COLO 205, and failed to inhibit the binding of HT-29. As predicted by these data, E-selectin showed substantial binding only to mucins purified from LS 180 and T84. These findings suggest that L- and P-selectin interact primarily with mucin-type ligands on colon cancers, whereas E-selectin can recognize both mucin and nonmucin ligands. Binding of the colon cancer lines to purified selectins correlates with their adhesion to activated endothelial cells (E-selectin-dependent), platelets (P-selectin-dependent), and neutrophils (L-selectin-dependent). These differential tumor cell-selectin interactions may influence metastatic spread and may also contribute to the observed variability in host response to tumor progression.
E选择素、P选择素和L选择素通过识别特定的碳水化合物配体来支持白细胞与血管壁的黏附,这些配体通常含有唾液酸化、岩藻糖基化的乳糖胺,如唾液酸化路易斯x [sLex;Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-4(Fucα1-3)GlcNAc-]。活化内皮细胞表达的E选择素已被证明可支持携带sLex的结肠癌细胞的黏附。在本研究中,我们检测了多种结肠癌细胞系与所有三种选择素的相互作用。三种结肠癌细胞系(LS 180、T84和COLO 205)与重组纯化的E选择素、P选择素和L选择素结合。结肠癌细胞系COLO 320与P选择素和L选择素结合,但不与E选择素结合;相反,HT-29细胞与E选择素结合,但不与P选择素和L选择素结合。Caco-2与这三种选择素中的任何一种几乎没有或没有相互作用。用溶血巴斯德氏菌的O-唾液酸糖蛋白酶处理细胞,该酶可选择性切割黏蛋白型O-连接糖蛋白,在所有情况下均降低了与纯化的P选择素和L选择素的结合。此外,重组可溶性P选择素和L选择素与所有贴壁肿瘤细胞系的亲和纯化黏蛋白结合。在与E选择素相互作用的四种肿瘤细胞系中,O-糖蛋白酶处理显著降低了LS 180和T84的黏附,对COLO 205影响很小,并且未能抑制HT-29的结合。正如这些数据所预测的,E选择素仅与从LS 180和T84纯化的黏蛋白有大量结合。这些发现表明,L选择素和P选择素主要与结肠癌上的黏蛋白型配体相互作用,而E选择素可以识别黏蛋白和非黏蛋白配体。结肠癌细胞系与纯化选择素的结合与其对活化内皮细胞(E选择素依赖性)、血小板(P选择素依赖性)和中性粒细胞(L选择素依赖性)的黏附相关。这些不同的肿瘤细胞-选择素相互作用可能影响转移扩散,也可能导致观察到的宿主对肿瘤进展反应的变异性。