Suppr超能文献

深部压疮愈合时间的预测因素

Predictors of time to healing deep pressure ulcers.

作者信息

van Rijswijk L, Polansky M

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 1994 Oct;40(8):40-2, 44, 46-8 passim.

PMID:7546099
Abstract

Time to healing analysis methods (Kaplan-Meier time until healing curves) were used to compare time to healing deep pressure ulcers as a function of patient and wound characteristics at baseline and after two weeks of treatment. Time to healing was significantly reduced in patients who had a good nutritional status. Patients who were alert and coherent were also found to heal more expediently; however, mental status was not independently predictive of time to healing in the multivariable model. Larger wounds took longer to heal (median 20 days) than smaller wounds, but the difference was not statistically significant. After two weeks of treatment, ulcers in patients who were 60 to 70 years old, who had a good nutritional status at baseline and whose ulcers reduced at least 39 percent in size after two weeks, were found to heal much more expediently. Cox regression models showed that these factors were independently predictive of time until healing (Likelihood ratio statistic on 5 DF = 26.485, p < 0.001). Clinical assessments, both at baseline and regular intervals thereafter, may predict treatment outcome of full-thickness pressure ulcers.

摘要

采用愈合时间分析方法(Kaplan-Meier直至愈合时间曲线)来比较深度压疮的愈合时间,该时间是患者和伤口特征在基线期及治疗两周后的函数。营养状况良好的患者愈合时间显著缩短。还发现神志清醒、连贯的患者愈合更快;然而,在多变量模型中,精神状态并非愈合时间的独立预测因素。较大的伤口比较小的伤口愈合时间更长(中位数为20天),但差异无统计学意义。治疗两周后,发现60至70岁、基线期营养状况良好且溃疡在两周后尺寸至少缩小39%的患者的溃疡愈合更快。Cox回归模型显示,这些因素是愈合时间的独立预测因素(5自由度的似然比统计量=26.485,p<0.001)。基线期及之后定期进行的临床评估可能预测全层压疮的治疗结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验